ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Emparejamiento Espacial por Puntuación de Propensión×Estimación Espacialmente Doblemente Robusta×
CampoInferencia causalInferencia causal
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen2000s2010s–2020s
Autor originalExtension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onwardExtension of Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994) doubly robust framework to spatial settings; developed in spatial epidemiology and econometrics literature
TipoQuasi-experimental matching estimatorSemiparametric causal estimator
Fuente seminalRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Papadogeorgou, G., Mealli, F., & Zigler, C. M. (2019). Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs. Biometrics, 75(3), 778-787. DOI ↗
AliasSpatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matchingSpatial DR, Spatial AIPW, Spatial augmented IPW, Doubly robust spatial causal estimation
Relacionados65
ResumenSpatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.Spatial doubly robust estimation is a semiparametric causal inference method that combines propensity score weighting with outcome regression modeling — providing protection against misspecification of either component — while explicitly accounting for spatial autocorrelation among units. It extends the classical augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimator to settings where treatment assignment and outcomes are geographically clustered or spatially dependent.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Spatial Propensity Score Matching · Spatial Doubly Robust Estimation. Recuperado el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare