Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| RPE de la sesión× | Relación de Carga de Trabajo Aguda-Crónica× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Ciencias del deporte | Ciencias del deporte |
| Familia | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| Año de origen≠ | 2001 | 2016 |
| Autor original≠ | Carl Foster | Tim Gabbett |
| Tipo≠ | subjective intensity assessment | workload monitoring |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Foster, C., Florhaug, J. A., Franklin, J., Gottschall, L., Hrovatin, L. A., Parker, S., & Dodge, C. (2001). A new approach to monitoring exercise training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 15(1), 109-115. DOI ↗ | Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273-280. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | sRPE, perceived exertion, subjective load | ACWR, workload ratio, training load balance |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Session rate of perceived exertion (sRPE) is a simple, athlete-centered method to quantify training load by combining perceived exertion intensity (RPE, 0-10 scale) with session duration. Introduced by Carl Foster (2001), sRPE avoids the need for external equipment (heart rate monitors, GPS, force plates) and captures the integrated physiological and psychological demands of any training modality. Despite its simplicity, sRPE correlates well with objective physiological markers (heart rate, lactate, VO2) and is widely adopted in elite and recreational sports for load management and recovery planning. | The acute-chronic workload ratio (ACWR) is the ratio of acute training load (typically the past 1 week) to chronic training load (typically the rolling 4-week average). Formalized by Tim Gabbett (2016), ACWR is a widely adopted metric for predicting injury and illness risk in sports. The logic is straightforward: rapid increases in training load—when acute load spikes far above what the athlete has adapted to—exceed tissue tolerance and increase injury risk. Conversely, maintaining ACWR within optimal ranges (typically 0.8-1.3) is associated with better performance and lower injury incidence. ACWR monitoring is now standard in elite sports for load management. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|