ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión (PSW / IPW)×Emparejamiento por Puntuación de Propensión×
CampoInferencia causalEstadística para la investigación
FamiliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Año de origen1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)1983
Autor originalRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipoCausal inference / reweightingMethod
Fuente seminalRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
AliasPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weightingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relacionados63
ResumenPropensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Matching. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare