Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Pareamiento por Puntuación de Propensión en Investigación Educativa× | Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión (PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Inferencia causal | Inferencia causal |
| Familia | Regression model | Regression model |
| Año de origen≠ | 1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| Autor original≠ | Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002) | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| Tipo≠ | Quasi-experimental / matching-based causal inference | Causal inference / reweighting |
| Fuente seminal | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | PSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching education | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Resumen≠ | Propensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|