ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Evaluación de políticas mediante ponderación por probabilidad inversa×Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión (PSW / IPW)×
CampoInferencia causalInferencia causal
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen1952 (IPW origin); 2000s (policy evaluation application)1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalHorvitz & Thompson (1952); extended to causal policy settings by Robins, Hernan & Brumback (2000) and Imbens & Wooldridge (2009)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoReweighting estimator for causal policy analysisCausal inference / reweighting
Fuente seminalImbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasIPW policy evaluation, propensity-weighted policy analysis, inverse probability of treatment weightingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionados66
ResumenPolicy evaluation inverse probability weighting (IPW) uses estimated propensity scores to reweight observed units so that the weighted sample mimics a randomised experiment. Each unit is weighted by the inverse of its probability of receiving the policy, creating a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of observed covariates and the average treatment effect (ATE) can be read off directly.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Policy Evaluation Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare