ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Evaluación de Impacto Contrafactual (CIE) para la Evaluación de Políticas×Método de Variables Instrumentales (VI) para Inferencia Causal×
CampoInferencia causalEconomía de la salud
FamiliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Año de origen1974 (Rubin potential outcomes); 2010s (EU policy CIE formalisation)1990s (modern applications)
Autor originalRubin (potential outcomes framework); European Commission DG Research formalised policy CIE guidelinesAngrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
TipoQuasi-experimental causal evaluationMethod
Fuente seminalImbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521885881Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
AliasCIE, policy CIE, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluationIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
Relacionados53
ResumenCounterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE) for policy assessment estimates the causal effect of a public policy or programme by comparing observed outcomes of participants against a rigorously constructed counterfactual — what would have happened had the policy not existed. Rooted in the Rubin potential-outcomes framework, CIE is the standard methodology endorsed by the European Commission for evaluating research, innovation, and structural funding programmes.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Policy Evaluation Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. Recuperado el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare