Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Ponderación por Puntuación de Propensión en Datos de Panel× | Emparejamiento por Puntuación de Propensión× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Inferencia causal | Estadística para la investigación |
| Familia≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2000-2003 | 1983 |
| Autor original≠ | Hirano, Imbens & Ridder; Robins, Hernan & Brumback | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Tipo≠ | Causal inference / panel weighting | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | panel PSW, panel IPW, longitudinal propensity score weighting, panel inverse probability weighting | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Panel Data Propensity Score Weighting (panel PSW) extends inverse probability weighting to longitudinal settings where the same units are observed across multiple time periods. It reweights observations by the inverse of each unit's time-varying probability of receiving treatment, creating a pseudo-population in which treatment is balanced on observed covariates at each period, and then estimates causal effects from repeated-measures data. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|