Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Estimador de Emparejamiento Multiperiódico× | Emparejamiento por Puntuación de Propensión× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Inferencia causal | Estadística para la investigación |
| Familia≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2005 | 1983 |
| Autor original≠ | Abadie (2005); Imbens & Wooldridge (2009) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Tipo≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Abadie, A. (2005). Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators. Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 1-19. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | panel matching estimator, longitudinal matching, multi-wave matching, repeated-cross-section matching | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | The multi-period matching estimator extends the standard matching framework to settings with multiple time periods, pairing each treated unit to similar untreated units based on pre-treatment covariates or propensity scores, then using within-pair before-after differences to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Leveraging repeated observations, it simultaneously controls for observed confounders and time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|