Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Variación de Procesos Monte Carlo× | Generación Automática de Patrones de Prueba× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Ingeniería eléctrica | Ingeniería eléctrica |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 2003 | 1966 |
| Autor original≠ | George S. Fishman, Sani R. Nassif | J. Paul Roth |
| Tipo≠ | Probabilistic modeling of semiconductor manufacturing variability | Automated fault-detection test vector generation |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Fishman, G. S. (1996). Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer-Verlag. DOI ↗ | Abramovici, M., Breuer, M. A., & Friedman, A. D. (1990). Digital Systems Testing and Testable Design. Computer Science Press. link ↗ |
| Alias | Monte Carlo simulation, Process variation analysis, PVT analysis | ATPG, Test pattern generation, Fault-based testing |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Monte Carlo Process Variation analysis quantifies the impact of manufacturing uncertainties on circuit performance using statistical sampling. As semiconductor technology scales, process variations (gate length, oxide thickness, dopant fluctuations) create significant uncertainties in delay, power, and leakage. Monte Carlo methods sample the random variation space, enabling statistical characterization of yield, timing margins, and reliability. Essential for modern technology nodes. | Automatic Test Pattern Generation (ATPG) is the automated creation of test vectors that detect manufacturing defects in digital circuits. Pioneered by Roth in 1966, ATPG systematically finds inputs that make stuck-at faults observable at outputs, enabling comprehensive fault detection. ATPG is critical for semiconductor manufacturing: enabling high test coverage ensures only good chips ship and identifies manufacturing process issues. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|