ScholarGate
Asistente

Comparar métodos

Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.

Randomización Mendeliana×Diseño de Regresión Discontinua (RDD)×
CampoInferencia causalInferencia causal
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Año de origen19972008
Autor originalGeorge Davey SmithImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
TipoGenetic instrumental variable frameworkQuasi-experimental causal design
Fuente seminalDavey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014). Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R89-R98. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
AliasMRRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
Relacionados25
ResumenMendelian randomization is a method for estimating causal effects of exposures on outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Introduced by George Davey Smith in the 1990s, it exploits Mendel's law of segregation to remove confounding bias. It has become a cornerstone technique in epidemiological causal inference.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGateConjunto de datos
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fuentes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir a la búsqueda Descargar diapositivas

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Mendelian Randomization · Regression Discontinuity. Recuperado el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/es/compare