Comparar métodos
Revisa los métodos seleccionados uno junto a otro; las filas que difieren aparecen resaltadas.
| Estimación Doblemente Robusta en Investigación Educativa× | Emparejamiento por Puntuación de Propensión× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Inferencia causal | Estadística para la investigación |
| Familia≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Año de origen≠ | 1994-2005 | 1983 |
| Autor original≠ | Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994); Bang & Robins (2005) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Tipo≠ | Causal inference / semiparametric estimator | Method |
| Fuente seminal≠ | Bang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models. Biometrics, 61(4), 962-973. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | DR estimator in education, AIPW in education, augmented IPW in education research, doubly robust causal estimation for educational outcomes | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumen≠ | Doubly robust estimation (DR) is a semiparametric causal inference approach that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity score model. In education research, it is used to estimate the causal effect of educational programs, interventions, or policies on student outcomes when treatment assignment is non-random but observed covariates can account for selection bias. The estimator is consistent if either — not necessarily both — of the two component models is correctly specified. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de datos ↗ |
|
|