Process / pipelineinnovation-strategy

Innovation Ambidexterity Scale

Innovation Ambidexterity—the organizational capacity to simultaneously engage in exploration (pursuing radical, novel innovations) and exploitation (improving and extending existing products and processes)—is fundamental to sustained competitive advantage. March (1991) formalized this trade-off in Organization Science, arguing that organizations must balance the two to survive and thrive. Exploration alone leads to variety but insufficient returns; exploitation alone leads to competence traps and vulnerability to disruption. This scale, operationalized by He and Wong (2004) and extended by Jansen et al. (2006), measures organizational capability in both domains and the degree to which firms balance competing innovation imperatives.

Open in MethodMindSoonVideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Sources

  1. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  2. He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
  3. Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576

Related methods

Referenced by

ScholarGateInnovation Ambidexterity Scale (Organizational Ambidexterity (Exploration-Exploitation) Scale). Retrieved 2026-06-04 from https://scholargate.app/en/strategic-management/innovation-ambidexterity-scale