Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Statistics›Paired Samples t-test
Hypothesis test

Paired Samples t-test

Also known as: dependent samples t-test, repeated measures t-test, matched-pairs t-test, eşleştirilmiş örneklem t-testi

The paired samples t-test is a parametric hypothesis test that compares two measurements taken on the same subjects — such as a before and after reading — to decide whether the average change differs from zero. It rests on the t-distribution introduced by Student (W. S. Gosset) in 1908 and works on the within-subject difference scores rather than the raw measurements.

ScholarGate
  1. Hypothesis test
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Paired t-test
Independent t-testOne-way ANOVARepeated-measures ANOVAWilcoxon signed-rank testBland-Altman AnalysisCrossover DesignEquivalence Test (TOST)McNemar's testMixed ANOVAPower Analysis for t-test

+3 more

When to use it

Use it when the same units are measured twice on a single continuous outcome — a pre-test/post-test design or any matched-pairs setup. Two assumptions should hold: the difference scores are approximately normally distributed (check with Shapiro-Wilk on the differences), and the pairs are genuinely linked. A sample of at least about 20 pairs is recommended so the normality of the differences can be assessed and the test has adequate power. If the differences are clearly non-normal or the sample is very small, use the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test instead.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • By removing stable between-subject differences it is more powerful than an independent t-test for the same effect.
  • Reports an interpretable paired effect size (Cohen's d) alongside the p-value and confidence interval.
  • Simple, widely accepted, and available in every analysis package.
Limitations
  • Requires genuinely paired or matched data; it cannot compare two independent groups.
  • Relies on the normality of the difference scores, which is fragile in small samples.
  • Limited to exactly two repeated measurements; three or more time points call for repeated-measures ANOVA.

Frequently asked

How is this different from the independent t-test?

The independent t-test compares two separate groups, while the paired t-test compares two measurements on the same subjects. Because the pairing removes stable individual differences, the paired test is usually more sensitive when the data are genuinely linked.

What if the difference scores are not normal?

Normality applies to the differences, not the raw values. If a Shapiro-Wilk test on the differences is significant or the sample is very small, switch to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the nonparametric counterpart.

How many pairs do I need?

At least about 20 pairs is recommended so the normality of the difference scores can be assessed and the test retains adequate power. With fewer pairs the normality assumption is hard to check and power drops sharply.

Why report an effect size?

The p-value only tells you whether the average change is detectable, not how large it is. Cohen's d for paired data expresses the mean difference in standard-deviation units, so you can judge practical importance alongside the mean difference and its 95% confidence interval.

Sources

  1. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE. ISBN: 978-1446249185
  2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: 10.4324/9780203771587 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Paired Samples t-test. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/paired-t-test

Related methods

Independent t-testOne-way ANOVARepeated-measures ANOVAWilcoxon signed-rank test

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Independent t-testStatistics↔ compare
  • One-way ANOVAStatistics↔ compare
  • Repeated-measures ANOVAStatistics↔ compare
  • Wilcoxon signed-rank testStatistics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Bland-Altman AnalysisCrossover DesignEquivalence Test (TOST)Independent t-testMcNemar's testMixed ANOVAPower Analysis for t-testRandomized Controlled TrialRepeated-measures ANOVASign TestWelch t-testWilcoxon signed-rank test

Similar methods

Paired samples t-testIndependent t-testWilcoxon signed-rank testRobust paired samples t-testIndependent samples t-testOne-sample t-testRepeated-measures ANOVASign Test

Related reference concepts

Hypothesis Testing FrameworkPermutation TestsMultivariate Analysis of VarianceStatistical Power and Sample SizeHypothesis TestingRank-Based Methods

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Paired t-test (Paired Samples t-test). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/paired-t-test · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Student (W. S. Gosset)
Year
1908
Family
Hypothesis test
Type
Parametric mean comparison (paired)
Groups
2
Outcome
continuous
Parametric
Yes
Distribution
Student t
Df
n - 1
Related methods
Independent t-testOne-way ANOVARepeated-measures ANOVAWilcoxon signed-rank test
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account