Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Sports Science›Center of Pressure Posturography
Hypothesis testBalance & Proprioception

Center of Pressure Posturography

Center of Pressure Analysis and Postural Stability Assessment · Also known as: CoP, postural sway, balance analysis, stability assessment

Center of pressure (CoP) posturography measures postural stability by analyzing the movement of the body's center of pressure—the point where the total force of body weight is concentrated—during quiet stance or dynamic balance tasks. Formalized by Duarte and colleagues (2000), CoP analysis provides quantitative metrics of postural sway including sway area, path length, and velocity. These measurements reflect the integrated function of sensory systems (proprioception, vestibular, visual), central integration, and motor control. CoP posturography is widely used in neurology, vestibular medicine, rehabilitation, and sports science to detect balance deficits and monitor recovery.

ScholarGate
  1. Hypothesis test
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Center of Pressure Posturography
Counter-Movement JumpElectromechanical DelayIsokinetic DynamometryReactive Strength Index

When to use it

CoP posturography is useful for evaluating balance deficits in vestibular disorders, neurological conditions (Parkinson disease, stroke), orthopedic injuries (ankle instability, ACL reconstruction), and aging. CoP testing can be performed with eyes open/closed and on stable/unstable surfaces to probe different sensory systems. The test assumes standing ability and minimal cognitive impairment. Standardized protocols and proper force plate setup are essential.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Objective, quantitative measurement of postural stability; more sensitive than clinical balance tests
  • Reveals specific contributions of different sensory systems (visual, vestibular, proprioceptive) via testing conditions
  • Sensitive to training adaptation and rehabilitation progress; detects improvements in balance stability
  • Cost-effective once equipment is purchased; quick to administer
  • Applicable across diverse populations and conditions
Limitations
  • Requires force plate equipment; not portable for field assessment
  • Interpretation of CoP metrics is complex; different metrics may yield conflicting information
  • High variability due to attention, fatigue, emotional state, and environmental factors
  • Standardization across labs is lacking; different software defines metrics differently
  • CoP sway in quiet stance may not predict dynamic balance or fall risk in real-world scenarios

Frequently asked

What does increased CoP sway indicate?

Increased sway can indicate poor proprioceptive input, vestibular dysfunction, weak stabilizing muscles, or impaired central processing of sensory information. Conversely, very small sway is ideal. However, some sway is normal and necessary; the nervous system actively uses sway to sample sensory information and maintain balance. Moderate sway with small amplitude (stable) is healthier than rigid, immobile posture.

Why do eyes-closed conditions increase sway?

Vision provides powerful postural feedback. When eyes close, reliance shifts to proprioception and vestibular input. In healthy individuals, sway increases 40-100% with eyes closed but remains stable. In vestibular or proprioceptive deficits, eyes-closed sway increases disproportionately (>200%), revealing the deficit. This comparison (eyes open vs. closed) helps identify the source of balance problems.

Does CoP sway predict actual falls?

CoP sway in laboratory testing correlates only modestly with real-world fall risk. Lab testing reflects quiet stance under controlled conditions, while falls occur during dynamic activities, distractions, and environmental perturbations. CoP testing detects balance deficits but should be combined with dynamic balance tests and functional assessments for better fall risk prediction.

How does aging affect CoP sway?

CoP sway increases progressively with age, starting around 40 years and accelerating after 65. Older adults show larger sway area, longer sway path, and increased velocity. This reflects cumulative decline in proprioception, vestibular function, muscle strength, and processing speed. However, resistance training and balance exercise slow or partially reverse age-related increases in sway.

Is CoP analysis useful in sports?

CoP analysis reveals postural control quality but only modestly predicts sport-specific balance or performance. Athletes in balance-demanding sports (gymnastics, surfing) typically show smaller sway, but training-specific improvements in sway may not transfer to dynamic sport performance. Use CoP testing alongside sport-specific balance and functional assessments.

Sources

  1. Duarte, M., & Freitas, S. M. (2010). Revision of posturography based on force plate for balance evaluation. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, 14(3), 183-192. link ↗
  2. Prieto, T. E., Myklebust, J. B., Hoffmann, R. G., Lovett, E. G., & Myklebust, B. M. (1996). Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy and vestibulopathic patients. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43(9), 956-966. link ↗
  3. Lee, K. Y., Kim, J. S., Park, S. H., & Choi, M. H. (2015). Postural stability during single-leg standing in individuals with functional ankle instability. Clinical Biomechanics, 30(10), 1141-1145. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Center of Pressure Analysis and Postural Stability Assessment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/sports-science/center-of-pressure-posturography

Related methods

Counter-Movement JumpElectromechanical DelayIsokinetic DynamometryReactive Strength Index

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Counter-Movement JumpSports Science↔ compare
  • Electromechanical DelaySports Science↔ compare
  • Isokinetic DynamometrySports Science↔ compare
  • Reactive Strength IndexSports Science↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

Mini-BESTest Balance EvaluationProprioception AssessmentBerg Balance ScaleTinettiTimed Up and Go TestNeuromuscular Re-EducationABC ScaleVSS

Related reference concepts

Balance and Postural ControlProprioceptive Training and BalanceVestibular and Balance DisordersCoordination and Gait AssessmentVestibular System and Balance PhysiologyVestibular Testing and Assessment

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Center of Pressure Posturography (Center of Pressure Analysis and Postural Stability Assessment). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/sports-science/center-of-pressure-posturography · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Teodoro Duarte
Subfamily
Balance & Proprioception
Year
2000
Type
force plate analysis
Related methods
Counter-Movement JumpElectromechanical DelayIsokinetic DynamometryReactive Strength Index
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account