Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Sports Medicine›ACL Return to Sport after Injury Scale
Process / pipelinepsychological readiness for sport

ACL Return to Sport after Injury Scale

ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale · Also known as: ACL-RSI

The ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale is a 12-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to measure the psychological impact and readiness to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Developed by Webster, Feller, and Lambros in 2008 and published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, the ACL-RSI addresses a critical gap in ACL rehabilitation assessment by quantifying psychological barriers to sport resumption—emotions, confidence in the knee, and risk appraisal—which are often more limiting than physical recovery.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

ACL Return to Sport after Injury Scale
Global Rating of Change…IKDC Subjective Knee FormPatient-Specific Functio…Marx Activity Rating Sca…

When to use it

The ACL-RSI is indicated for athletes in the latter stages of ACL reconstruction rehabilitation (typically 4+ months post-op), when physical recovery is substantial but psychological readiness is uncertain. Use ACL-RSI when decision-making around return to sport requires understanding of psychological factors beyond physical tests (strength, hop tests, ROM). It is particularly valuable for identifying athletes at high risk of non-return or re-injury due to fear or low confidence, allowing targeted psychological intervention (fear-exposure therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, return-to-sport confidence coaching). The ACL-RSI is less useful in acute post-op phases (first 3 months) when psychological responses are still forming.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Excellent test–retest reliability (ICC 0.89–0.94) and internal consistency (Cronbach α 0.87–0.91); psychometrically sound across multiple languages and populations.
  • Addresses the 'missing link' in ACL rehabilitation: psychological barriers that prevent return to sport despite physical readiness; strong predictor of actual sport return at 6–12 months (better than physical tests alone).
  • Three-subscale structure allows targeted intervention identification (e.g., if Emotions subscale is low, recommend fear-reduction therapy; if Confidence low, recommend graduated sport-specific training).
  • Quick administration (5–10 minutes) and simple 0–10 NRS format; easily integrated into rehabilitation pathways; no special equipment or training required.
Limitations
  • Measures only psychological readiness; does not assess physical capacity (strength, power, proprioception). Must be paired with objective physical testing (isokinetic strength, hop tests, Y-balance) for comprehensive return-to-sport decision-making.
  • Scores may be influenced by recent re-injury or negative sport experience; temporal context matters (administer at consistent point in rehabilitation, e.g., 6 months post-op).
  • Cutoff score (<56) is based on group-level data; individual decision-making should integrate ACL-RSI with clinical judgment, physical measures, sport demands, and athlete preferences.
  • Limited for non-ACL injuries; while conceptually applicable to other sport injuries, validation data are primarily from ACL populations.

Frequently asked

What does a score of <56 mean, and does it prevent the athlete from returning to sport?

A score <56 indicates significant psychological barriers (high fear, low confidence, or high perceived risk) that require attention. It does NOT mean the athlete cannot return to sport. Instead, it is a signal to provide targeted psychological support: fear-exposure therapy, sport-confidence coaching, or cognitive restructuring. Many athletes with initial ACL-RSI <56 successfully return to sport after 4–8 weeks of additional psychological intervention.

Can I use ACL-RSI for non-ACL injuries (e.g., meniscal repair, ankle ligament injury)?

ACL-RSI items are ACL-specific ('re-injuring your knee', 'give way during sport'). While the psychological construct is relevant to other injuries, validation data are limited outside ACL. Consider ACL-RSI for ACL-specific populations; for other injuries, use generic psychological outcome measures or condition-specific instruments if available.

Should I use ACL-RSI at 3 months post-op or wait until 6 months?

Administration at 3 months is too early; post-op distress and incomplete rehabilitation cloud psychological assessment. Administer at 4–6 months post-op when physical recovery is substantial (e.g., quadriceps strength >90% limb symmetry) and psychological responses have stabilized. If repeat testing is planned, use consistent timing (e.g., always at 6-month intervals).

What is the minimal clinically important change (MCID) on the ACL-RSI?

MCID data are limited; estimated change of 10–15 points on the total score (out of 120) is considered clinically meaningful improvement in psychological readiness. Subscale changes of 5–8 points are notable. Compare change scores against baseline and consider clinical context (e.g., an athlete improving from 45 to 60 has crossed the >56 threshold and is now in the acceptable range).

Sources

  1. Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(6):893-900. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/sports-medicine/acl-return-to-sport-scale

Related methods

Global Rating of Change ScaleIKDC Subjective Knee FormPatient-Specific Functional Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Global Rating of Change ScaleSports Medicine↔ compare
  • IKDC Subjective Knee FormSports Medicine↔ compare
  • Patient-Specific Functional ScaleSports Medicine↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

IKDC Subjective Knee FormMarx Activity Rating Scale

Similar methods

Lysholm Knee ScaleMarx Activity Rating ScaleIKDC Subjective Knee FormKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome ScoreSport Confidence InventoryAthletic Identity Measurement ScaleLower Extremity Functional ScaleCompetitive State Anxiety Inventory-2

Related reference concepts

Return to Activity and Sport After Orthopedic InjuryJoint Instability and Ligamentous InjuryOrthopedic Rehabilitation and OutcomesFunctional Assessment and Disability MeasuresKnee Pathology: Meniscal and Ligamentous DiseaseSoft Tissue Repair and Reconstruction

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — ACL Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/sports-medicine/acl-return-to-sport-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Kevin E. Webster, Julian A. Feller, Christopher Lambros
Subfamily
psychological readiness for sport
Year
2008
Type
Patient self-report
Related methods
Global Rating of Change ScaleIKDC Subjective Knee FormPatient-Specific Functional Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account