Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis — Quantifying Output Uncertainty via Probabilistic Input Sampling
Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis (Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis) · Also known as: PSA, Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis, Stochastic SA, Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis
Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) extends classical one-at-a-time sensitivity testing by representing uncertain model inputs as probability distributions and propagating them through the model via Monte Carlo sampling. The result is a full distribution of possible outputs, together with rankings of which inputs drive output variance the most — enabling robust, evidence-grounded conclusions under uncertainty.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Use Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis when a model contains multiple uncertain parameters that vary simultaneously and you need to characterise the full distribution of possible outcomes rather than a single best-guess figure. It is the standard approach in health technology assessment (NICE, ICER), environmental risk modelling, and engineering reliability. Prefer PSA over one-way sensitivity analysis when parameter uncertainties are correlated or when the decision threshold is close to the model output. Do NOT use it as a substitute for structural validation — PSA only propagates parametric uncertainty, not model misspecification. Avoid when N is very small or computational cost per model run is prohibitive without surrogate modelling.
Strengths & limitations
- Provides a full output distribution rather than isolated point estimates, enabling probability statements about outcomes.
- Handles simultaneous variation of all uncertain parameters, capturing interaction effects missed by one-at-a-time analysis.
- Sensitivity indices identify the key drivers of uncertainty, directing future research investment efficiently.
- Widely accepted by regulatory and health-economic bodies (e.g., NICE, FDA) as the preferred uncertainty analysis framework.
- Scales to complex models with many parameters through Latin Hypercube Sampling and variance decomposition techniques.
- Requires credible probability distributions for all inputs; poorly specified distributions produce misleading results.
- Computationally intensive for models with long run times — each of thousands of draws requires a full model evaluation.
- Does not capture structural or model-form uncertainty; a mis-specified model will give precise but biased PSA results.
- Correlation structures between inputs are often unknown and are frequently ignored, which can understate true uncertainty.
Frequently asked
How does Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis differ from deterministic (one-way) sensitivity analysis?
Deterministic analysis varies one parameter at a time while holding others fixed, producing a tornado diagram. Stochastic SA varies all parameters simultaneously according to their distributions, yielding a full output distribution and interaction-aware sensitivity indices — far more informative when parameters are correlated or multiple thresholds are at risk.
How many Monte Carlo draws (N) are typically required?
For stable mean and median estimates, N = 1,000 is usually sufficient. For reliable tail probabilities (e.g., 95th percentile) or Sobol indices, N = 10,000 or more is recommended. Latin Hypercube Sampling can achieve similar precision at roughly one-fifth the draws of pure random sampling.
What is the Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) and how does it relate to PSA?
EVPI is a decision-theoretic output of PSA that quantifies the maximum worth of eliminating all parameter uncertainty. It is computed directly from the PSA output distribution as the difference between the expected net benefit under perfect information and under the current decision. A high EVPI signals that further research is economically warranted.
Can PSA detect model structural uncertainty?
No. PSA only propagates uncertainty in the parameters of the chosen model structure. Structural uncertainty — whether the model itself is the right representation of reality — requires separate analysis such as model comparison, cross-validation, or expert elicitation about competing structures.
Which sensitivity index should I use — correlation coefficients or Sobol indices?
Spearman or partial rank correlation coefficients are quick to compute and work well for monotonic models. Sobol variance-based indices are model-free and capture non-linear and interaction effects, making them preferable for complex or non-monotonic models, at the cost of requiring larger N.
Sources
- Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Wiley. ISBN: 9780470059975
- Briggs, A. H., Claxton, K., Sculpher, M. (2012). Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press. link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis (Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/simulation/stochastic-sensitivity-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATIONDecision-making↔ compare
- SENSITIVITY-ANALYSISDecision-making↔ compare
- Stochastic Discrete-Event SimulationSimulation↔ compare
- Stochastic Markov ModelSimulation↔ compare
- Stochastic Scenario AnalysisSimulation↔ compare