Process / pipelineReview / evidence synthesis

Integrative Review — Integrative Literature Review

An integrative review is a systematic method for synthesising literature that allows the simultaneous inclusion of diverse study designs — experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental — as well as theoretical papers. Unlike the conventional systematic review, which is restricted to controlled trials or a single methodology, the integrative review builds a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon by drawing on the full breadth of the relevant evidence base. The method follows a rigorous, structured pipeline to ensure transparency and minimise bias.

Apply with LacunaSoonVideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Sources

  1. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
  2. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. DOI: 10.1177/1534484305278283

Related methods

Referenced by

ScholarGateIntegrative Review (Integrative Literature Review). Retrieved 2026-06-04 from https://scholargate.app/en/scientometrics/integrative-review