Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis
Sociotechnical imaginaries analysis studies the collectively held, institutionally stabilised, and publicly performed visions of desirable futures that societies attach to science and technology. Introduced by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim in their 2009 comparison of nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, the concept treats imaginaries as more than rhetoric: they are co-produced with the material and political order, shaping how technologies are designed, governed, and lived. The method reconstructs these visions from public discourse, traces how they become embedded in institutions and policy, and compares how the same technology animates different imaginaries across nations or eras.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 ↗
- Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226276359
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Sociotechnical Imaginaries. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/science-technology-studies/sociotechnical-imaginaries-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ compare
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ compare
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ compare
- Technological Frames AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ compare