ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineCo-production

Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis

Sociotechnical imaginaries analysis studies the collectively held, institutionally stabilised, and publicly performed visions of desirable futures that societies attach to science and technology. Introduced by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim in their 2009 comparison of nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, the concept treats imaginaries as more than rhetoric: they are co-produced with the material and political order, shaping how technologies are designed, governed, and lived. The method reconstructs these visions from public discourse, traces how they become embedded in institutions and policy, and compares how the same technology animates different imaginaries across nations or eras.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
  2. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226276359

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Analysis of Sociotechnical Imaginaries. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/science-technology-studies/sociotechnical-imaginaries-analysis

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateSociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis (Analysis of Sociotechnical Imaginaries). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/science-technology-studies/sociotechnical-imaginaries-analysis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026