ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis×Actor-Network Theory Analysis×
FieldScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin20091984
OriginatorSheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun KimBruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law
TypeQualitative interpretive and comparative methodMaterial-semiotic theory and analytic method
Seminal sourceJasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146. DOI ↗Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051
AliasesSociotechnical imaginary analysis, Imaginaries of science and technology, Visions of desirable futures analysisANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping
Related44
SummarySociotechnical imaginaries analysis studies the collectively held, institutionally stabilised, and publicly performed visions of desirable futures that societies attach to science and technology. Introduced by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim in their 2009 comparison of nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, the concept treats imaginaries as more than rhetoric: they are co-produced with the material and political order, shaping how technologies are designed, governed, and lived. The method reconstructs these visions from public discourse, traces how they become embedded in institutions and policy, and compares how the same technology animates different imaginaries across nations or eras.Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis · Actor-Network Theory Analysis. Retrieved 2026-06-25 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare