Process / pipelineliterature-retrieval

Grey Literature Search

Grey literature comprises documents and data not published through conventional commercial channels—including theses, government reports, clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, organizational policy documents, and working papers. Unlike journal articles, grey literature is not indexed in MEDLINE or Scopus and often lacks peer review. However, it is crucial for systematic reviews because it may contain null or negative findings that are less likely to be published (publication bias). Systematic grey literature searching is now a standard component of evidence synthesis and is recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration, PRISMA, and other methodological guidelines.

Find Topic with PaperMindSoonVideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Sources

  1. Rothstein, H. R., & Hopewell, S. (2009). Grey literature. In J. P. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.0.2, Chapter 13). The Cochrane Collaboration. link
  2. Wood, A. M., Egger, M., Gluud, L. L., Schulz, K. F., Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Gluud, C. (2008). Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ, 336(7644), 601–605. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD
  3. Mahood, Q., Van Eerd, D., & Irvin, E. (2014). Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 353–364. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1132

Related methods

Referenced by

ScholarGateGrey Literature Search (Systematic Search and Retrieval of Grey Literature). Retrieved 2026-06-04 from https://scholargate.app/en/research-skills/grey-literature-search