Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Research Ethics›Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling
Process / pipelineplagiarism-detection-and-prevention

Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling

Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling: Reusing One's Own Previously Published Work Without Disclosure · Also known as: text recycling, self-copying, duplicate publication, redundant publication

Self-plagiarism, or text recycling, occurs when an author reuses substantial portions of their own previously published work in a new publication without disclosure or acknowledgment. This includes republishing the same article in different venues, duplicating methods sections across multiple papers, or reusing discussion sections. While the intellectual property is the author's own, self-plagiarism is considered misconduct because it violates the principle that published work represents new research and it may inflate publication counts.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling
Similarity vs Plagiarism…Verbatim Plagiarism

When to use it

Understanding self-plagiarism is critical for: (1) authors ensuring they do not reuse unpublished work without disclosure and understanding that permissions may be required; (2) journal editors and peer reviewers identifying potential duplicate publications; (3) institutional research integrity offices investigating misconduct involving redundant publication; (4) funders monitoring whether grantees are responsibly conducting and reporting research; (5) students understanding the boundaries between building on their thesis work and inappropriately reusing it in new contexts.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Clarifies the often-misunderstood concept that authors must still credit their own prior work appropriately
  • Emphasizes transparency and honesty as core values, not just avoiding plagiarism of others' work
  • Addresses a real institutional problem (inflated publication counts, reviewer time wasted) that impacts research integrity
  • Provides a framework for what reuse is acceptable (with disclosure and permission) versus prohibited (without disclosure)
Limitations
  • Differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; what constitutes prohibited self-plagiarism in one journal may be acceptable elsewhere
  • Difficult to enforce across publishers and repositories; authors may republish without detection if venues do not communicate
  • Standard language and methods descriptions in a field may create high similarity scores even without self-plagiarism
  • Cultural differences in publishing practices affect interpretation; some countries or fields have different norms about reuse of prior work

Frequently asked

Can I publish my PhD dissertation as a journal article?

Yes, but with important conditions. You must disclose to the journal that the work is based on a previously published dissertation (e.g., 'This article is based on the author's doctoral dissertation, University X, 2020'). Some publishers require explicit permission or may require that you modify the work substantially before accepting it. Check the journal's author guidelines about prior publication. If your dissertation is already in a university repository (ProQuest, institutional archive), you must disclose this. Some journals will not accept work that has been distributed widely in dissertation form. Always ask the editor before submitting.

Is it self-plagiarism if I cite my own prior work when using similar language?

Citing your own work is good practice and shows the lineage of your research. However, citation alone does not permit verbatim reuse of substantial text. If you are reusing methods language across related studies, cite the prior paper and consider whether the methods have truly not changed—if they are identical, note that. For results and discussion, substantial new writing is expected. You can cite your prior findings and build on them, but copying your prior discussion verbatim requires quotation marks or substantial rewriting. As a rule, if a reader could not tell that new writing has occurred, rewrite the section.

What if I post my work as a preprint before submitting to a journal—does that count as prior publication?

It depends on the journal and field. In biomedicine, preprints (on servers like medRxiv) are increasingly accepted, and many journals permit submission of preprinted work if you disclose it. In other fields, preprint servers are less common or may be considered prior publication. Check the target journal's policy on preprints in their author guidelines. Most journals require you to disclose if the manuscript is posted on a preprint server. Disclose proactively to avoid rejection. If you post on a preprint server, update the journal submission to include the preprint DOI.

If my prior work was rejected, can I resubmit it to another journal without disclosing the prior rejection?

Yes, you can revise and resubmit to a different journal without disclosing the prior rejection. However, if the new submission uses substantially the same text, it may show high similarity to the prior submission in database checks. Rewrite and strengthen the manuscript substantially, and do not verbatim copy from the rejected version. The prohibition against redundant publication applies to accepted and published work, not rejected submissions. However, if you significantly reuse text, you should disclose the prior submission in the cover letter, as editors often ask about prior submissions of related work.

Sources

  1. Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗
  2. Research Integrity Journal. (2022). Salami publishing and duplicate submission: A systematic review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8, 1-12. link ↗
  3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2023). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 330(6), 567-575. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 4). Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling: Reusing One's Own Previously Published Work Without Disclosure. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/research-ethics/self-plagiarism

Related methods

Similarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionVerbatim Plagiarism

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Similarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionResearch Ethics↔ compare
  • Verbatim PlagiarismResearch Ethics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

Duplicate Publication and Salami SlicingPlagiarism in Academic ResearchVerbatim PlagiarismParaphrasing PlagiarismIdea Plagiarism and Concept TheftArticle Retraction ProcessTurnitin and iThenticate Similarity DetectionCOPE Guidelines for Publication Ethics

Related reference concepts

Reproducible ResearchEthicsPublication BiasPublication BiasSystematic ReviewSTROBE Statement and Observational Study Reporting

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling (Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling: Reusing One's Own Previously Published Work Without Disclosure). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/research-ethics/self-plagiarism · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Subfamily
plagiarism-detection-and-prevention
Year
1990s
Type
Concept
Related methods
Similarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionVerbatim Plagiarism
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account