Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Research Ethics›Paraphrasing Plagiarism
Process / pipelineplagiarism-detection-and-prevention

Paraphrasing Plagiarism

Paraphrasing Plagiarism: Inadequate Rewording Without Citation · Also known as: insufficient paraphrase, close paraphrase, lazy paraphrasing

Paraphrasing plagiarism occurs when an author rewrites another's ideas in different words but does not cite the source. Unlike verbatim plagiarism (copying word-for-word), paraphrasing plagiarism involves changing vocabulary and sentence structure while retaining the original argument, logic, or conceptual content without attribution. It is harder to detect than direct copying but is still a clear violation of academic integrity.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Paraphrasing Plagiarism
Idea Plagiarism and Conc…Mosaic PlagiarismSimilarity vs Plagiarism…Verbatim Plagiarism

When to use it

Understanding paraphrasing plagiarism is essential for: (1) writers developing their own research and literature reviews to cite all sources of ideas, not just direct quotations; (2) students learning the difference between acceptable paraphrase (with citation) and plagiarism (without); (3) peer reviewers evaluating whether references are properly attributed and whether ideas appear to be borrowed without credit; (4) instructors assessing whether students understand the material or are simply rewording sources; (5) authors ensuring their own manuscripts do not inadvertently plagiarize prior work through poor paraphrasing.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Emphasizes the principle that citations are required for ideas, not just word-for-word copying
  • Distinguishes between legitimate paraphrase (a valued writing skill) and plagiarism, highlighting the centrality of attribution
  • Addresses a common form of misconduct among students who believe rewording absolves them of citation responsibility
  • Draws attention to the difference between form (wording) and substance (ideas); substance is what must be attributed
Limitations
  • More difficult to detect through automated software than verbatim plagiarism; manual review required by someone familiar with the source material
  • Boundary between acceptable paraphrase and plagiarism is sometimes subjective, especially in fields with established terminology and standard explanations
  • Detecting requires access to original sources; plagiarism of paraphrased content from obscure or deleted sources may go undetected
  • In some fields (e.g., methods descriptions, standard procedures), similar language across papers is acceptable and expected even without citation

Frequently asked

If I cite the source, can I paraphrase without worrying about how similar my wording is?

Once you cite the source, you have credited the original author, and some textual similarity is acceptable. However, citation does not give you permission to copy structure or language extensively. A good paraphrase should be substantially rewritten—different vocabulary, different sentence structure, rearranged logic. A citation means 'this idea comes from here,' but does not mean 'this wording comes from here.' If you are reusing phrases or sentence patterns substantially, consider using quotation marks around those phrases in addition to citation, or rewrite more thoroughly.

How different does my paraphrase need to be from the original?

There is no fixed similarity threshold. A proper paraphrase should be written as if you are explaining the idea to someone unfamiliar with the original. Change vocabulary (use synonyms and different terms), restructure sentences, reorganize the logical flow, and add your own commentary or interpretation. If a reader could lay your paraphrase next to the original and see the same words in the same order, it is too close. A good test: can you explain the paraphrased idea from memory, or are you copying while changing words? If the latter, either quote and cite, or study the material more thoroughly and then write.

Is common knowledge in my field exempt from citation?

Common knowledge in a field is often cited anyway for credibility and to direct readers to foundational sources. When in doubt, cite. However, widely known facts that are not attributed to a specific source in the original literature (e.g., 'photosynthesis is the process by which plants convert sunlight to chemical energy') do not require citation. If you can find multiple independent sources making the same claim, it is likely common knowledge. If an idea is traced to a specific researcher or publication, it is not common knowledge and must be cited regardless of how well-known it is in the field.

What if I paraphrase from a secondary source that cites a primary source?

Cite the secondary source (the one you actually read). Do not cite the primary source unless you have read it directly. If you want to cite the primary source, you must read it. Alternatively, you can note in your text that the idea comes from primary source X 'as cited in' secondary source Y. This is honest attribution and protects you from misrepresenting what you have read. Never cite a source you have not read; this is a form of plagiarism and creates false attribution trails.

Sources

  1. Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗
  2. Hirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗
  3. Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 4). Paraphrasing Plagiarism: Inadequate Rewording Without Citation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/research-ethics/paraphrasing-plagiarism

Related methods

Idea Plagiarism and Concept TheftMosaic PlagiarismSimilarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionVerbatim Plagiarism

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Idea Plagiarism and Concept TheftResearch Ethics↔ compare
  • Mosaic PlagiarismResearch Ethics↔ compare
  • Similarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionResearch Ethics↔ compare
  • Verbatim PlagiarismResearch Ethics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Idea Plagiarism and Concept TheftMosaic PlagiarismSimilarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionVerbatim Plagiarism

Similar methods

Verbatim PlagiarismPlagiarism in Academic ResearchMosaic PlagiarismIdea Plagiarism and Concept TheftSimilarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionTurnitin and iThenticate Similarity DetectionSelf-Plagiarism and Text RecyclingParaphrase Detection

Related reference concepts

Source Criticism and EvidenceIntertextuality TheoryPrimary and Secondary SourcesEquivalence and Translation ShiftsIntertextuality and the TextWriting Assignments

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Paraphrasing Plagiarism (Paraphrasing Plagiarism: Inadequate Rewording Without Citation). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/research-ethics/paraphrasing-plagiarism · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Academic integrity framework (modern definition)
Subfamily
plagiarism-detection-and-prevention
Year
1980s
Type
Concept
Related methods
Idea Plagiarism and Concept TheftMosaic PlagiarismSimilarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the DistinctionVerbatim Plagiarism
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account