Which method should I use?

Describe your research situation in a few words; we surface the methods from the library that best fit your goal and data.

Recommendations for: rank alternatives across multiple weighted criteria for a decision

  1. FUCADecision Making

    FUCA (Flexible and Universal Compromise Analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Raveh, A. in 2000. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

  2. BORDADecision Making

    BORDA (Borda Count — Positional scoring rule for rank aggregation) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Borda, J.-C. de in 1900. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

  3. EVAMIXDecision Making

    EVAMIX (EVAluation of MIXed data) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Voogd, H. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

  4. MERECDecision Making

    MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

  5. TOPSISDecision Making

    TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. in 1981. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

  6. PIF-TOPSISDecision Making

    PIF-TOPSIS (PiF-TOPSIS — Picture extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Cuong, B. C., Kreinovich, V. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

Common question: which method?

For the most-asked situations, the methods the library surfaces.

Which method compares the means of two or more groups?

Refine this scenario →

Which method predicts a continuous outcome from several variables?

Refine this scenario →

Which method classifies observations into categories?

Refine this scenario →

Which method groups similar observations without labels?

Refine this scenario →

Which method tests the association between two variables?

Refine this scenario →

Which method reduces many correlated variables to a few factors?

Refine this scenario →

Which method ranks alternatives across multiple criteria?

Refine this scenario →

Which method analyzes time-to-event data with censoring?

Refine this scenario →
Which method should I use? — ScholarGate