Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Qualitative›Interpretive Metaphor Analysis — Qualitative Metaphor Research
Process / pipelineQualitative design / analysis

Interpretive Metaphor Analysis — Qualitative Metaphor Research

Interpretive Metaphor Analysis · Also known as: IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysis

Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Interpretive Metaphor Analysis
Critical Discourse Analy…Discourse AnalysisInterpretive content ana…Interpretive Discourse A…Metaphor AnalysisThematic AnalysisCritical Metaphor Analys…Interpretive Semiotic An…

When to use it

Use interpretive metaphor analysis when your research question concerns how people conceptualize or make meaning of a complex, abstract, or emotionally loaded experience — such as illness, leadership, learning, conflict, or identity. It is especially valuable when other methods have produced surface-level accounts and you suspect that language itself carries meaning worth analysing. The method requires text data rich in spontaneous language (interviews, open-ended responses, media texts, documents). It is not appropriate when data are primarily numerical, when participants produce only short or highly structured answers, or when the research goal is frequency counting or hypothesis testing. It is also ill-suited as the sole method when the phenomenon is not inherently linguistic or when participants' first language differs substantially from the language of analysis without robust translation protocols in place.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Accesses deep cognitive and cultural frames that participants may not articulate explicitly, revealing tacit assumptions embedded in everyday language.
  • Compatible with a range of text sources — interviews, documents, media, narratives — making it flexible across disciplines and research contexts.
  • The interpretive lens allows attention to context, power, and ideology, not just linguistic patterns.
  • Particularly powerful for studying emotionally charged or stigmatized topics where participants communicate obliquely through metaphor.
  • Generates findings that are accessible and compelling to policy and practice audiences because metaphors are concrete and memorable.
Limitations
  • Identifying conceptual metaphors requires substantial theoretical grounding in Lakoff and Johnson's framework; without this, the analysis risks remaining at a superficial, literary level.
  • Cross-linguistic or cross-cultural studies are methodologically demanding, since metaphorical mappings vary across languages and cultures.
  • The method cannot establish the frequency or prevalence of a metaphor in a population — it reveals structure and meaning, not distribution.
  • Findings may be difficult to replicate because the interpretive step involves researcher judgment that is not fully rule-governed.

Frequently asked

How is interpretive metaphor analysis different from standard discourse analysis?

Discourse analysis broadly examines how language constructs meaning and social reality. Interpretive metaphor analysis is a more specialized tool that focuses specifically on conceptual mappings — how one domain of experience is systematically understood through another. It uses Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory as a framework for identifying and grouping metaphorical expressions, whereas discourse analysis may employ a wider range of linguistic and rhetorical tools. The two can be combined, with metaphor analysis serving as one analytical strand within a broader discourse study.

How many participants or texts do I need?

There is no fixed minimum, but the principle is conceptual saturation: you need enough data that the dominant metaphorical frames and their tensions have had opportunity to emerge. In interview-based studies, 8–20 participants is common. For document or media analysis, the relevant criterion is sufficient variety in the text corpus to capture range, not just repetition. More important than sample size is the richness and spontaneity of the language in the data.

What is the difference between a metaphorical expression and a conceptual metaphor?

A metaphorical expression is a specific word or phrase in the text (e.g., 'I am drowning in work'). A conceptual metaphor is the underlying cognitive mapping that generates multiple such expressions (e.g., DIFFICULTIES ARE FLOODS). Interpretive metaphor analysis works by collecting many metaphorical expressions, grouping them by their shared source and target domains, and then naming and interpreting the conceptual metaphor that underlies each cluster.

Can I use software for this analysis?

Qualitative data management software (NVivo, ATLAS.ti, MaxQDA) can assist with organizing and retrieving coded expressions, and corpus linguistics tools can help identify candidate metaphorical terms across large text collections. However, the intellectual work of identifying conceptual domains, grouping expressions into mappings, and interpreting what those mappings mean in context must be done by the analyst. There is no software that performs genuine interpretive metaphor analysis automatically.

Is this method appropriate for translated interview data?

With caution. Metaphors are language- and culture-specific, so direct translation can destroy or alter conceptual mappings. Best practice is to conduct metaphor identification in the original language with bilingual coders, note culturally specific source domains, and be explicit in the write-up about how translation choices were managed. Cross-linguistic metaphor analysis is an active area of methodological development.

Sources

  1. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013
  2. Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Interpretive Metaphor Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/qualitative/interpretive-metaphor-analysis

Related methods

Critical Discourse AnalysisDiscourse AnalysisInterpretive content analysisInterpretive Discourse AnalysisMetaphor AnalysisThematic Analysis

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Critical Discourse AnalysisQualitative↔ compare
  • Discourse AnalysisQualitative Research↔ compare
  • Interpretive content analysisQualitative↔ compare
  • Interpretive Discourse AnalysisQualitative↔ compare
  • Metaphor AnalysisQualitative↔ compare
  • Thematic AnalysisQualitative Research↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Critical Metaphor AnalysisInterpretive Semiotic Analysis

Similar methods

Metaphor AnalysisCritical Metaphor AnalysisField-based Metaphor AnalysisLongitudinal Metaphor AnalysisDigital Metaphor analysisMultiple Case-Based Metaphor AnalysisInterpretive Discourse AnalysisVisual Elicitation Metaphor Analysis

Related reference concepts

Qualitative Research MethodsCritical Discourse AnalysisConceptual Models and Mental ModelsMixed-Methods Research in HealthcareQ MethodologyDiscourse Analysis

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Interpretive Metaphor Analysis (Interpretive Metaphor Analysis). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/qualitative/interpretive-metaphor-analysis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory
Year
1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure)
Type
Qualitative interpretive analysis
DataType
Verbal or written text (interviews, documents, media, narratives)
Subfamily
Qualitative design / analysis
Related methods
Critical Discourse AnalysisDiscourse AnalysisInterpretive content analysisInterpretive Discourse AnalysisMetaphor AnalysisThematic Analysis
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account