Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Publication Ethics›ICMJE Authorship Criteria
Process / pipelineauthorship-standards

ICMJE Authorship Criteria

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authorship Criteria · Also known as: ICMJE Authorship, Authorship Guidelines

The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) established the most widely adopted authorship standard in biomedical research in 1978. These criteria define who qualifies as an author and distinguish authors from contributors, establishing accountability and preventing disputes over publication credit. Used by over 10,000 journals globally, ICMJE authorship criteria form the foundation of authorship practices in medical, life science, and health-related research.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

ICMJE Authorship Criteria
COPE Guidelines for Publ…Duplicate Publication an…Peer Review ProcessPlagiarism in Academic R…

When to use it

Apply ICMJE criteria at the start of any research project, especially those involving multiple researchers. Use these criteria when writing a manuscript intended for publication in a biomedical or clinical journal. Review criteria before manuscript submission to ensure all authors agree and no disputes will arise. Use them as a basis for institutional authorship policies. Apply to thesis committees to clarify supervisor vs. student author status.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Internationally standardized and recognized by 10,000+ journals, eliminating ambiguity across different publishing contexts.
  • Operationally clear—four concrete requirements eliminate subjective judgments about 'significance' of contribution.
  • Protects authors by requiring accountability; an author cannot later disavow responsibility for the work.
  • Reduces authorship disputes by forcing explicit discussion early in the project.
Limitations
  • The four criteria can be interpreted flexibly, especially criterion 1 ('substantial contribution'—no minimum threshold defined).
  • Does not address relative weighting of contributions (first author vs. middle author).
  • Does not resolve situations where multiple people contribute equally or where roles overlap.
  • Some fields (e.g., large physics collaborations, field ecology) have adapted ICMJE criteria in discipline-specific ways.

Frequently asked

Does providing funding or equipment make someone an author?

No. Providing funding, materials, or lab space does not meet ICMJE criteria unless that person also contributed intellectually to conception, design, data analysis, drafting, revision, or approval. Such contributors are listed in Acknowledgments, not as authors.

Can a supervisor always be an author on a student's work?

Only if the supervisor meets all four criteria. If the supervisor designed the study and critically revised the manuscript, yes. If they only provided oversight or laboratory facilities, they should be acknowledged but not listed as an author.

What if team members contributed equally—how should we list authors?

All co-equal authors must meet the same four criteria. The author order is a convention issue (not addressed by ICMJE) and is decided by the research team. Some journals allow a footnote stating 'these authors contributed equally.' Order does not determine authorship validity.

If I disagree about authorship, what should I do?

Document your concern in writing to the corresponding author and journal editor before submission. If unresolved, contact your institution's research integrity office. Many journals will not process a manuscript if authorship is disputed.

Can an author be removed after publication?

Yes, but it is rare and requires all remaining authors' agreement and explanation. The journal publishes a correction or retraction notice. This is different from a formal retraction (which invalidates the entire paper) and signals serious authorship misconduct.

Sources

  1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE. link ↗
  2. Drummond, M. F., Jefferson, T. O., & British Medical Association. (2009). Guidelines for Authors and Peer Reviewers of Economic Submissions to the BMJ. BMJ, 313(7052), 275–283. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authorship Criteria. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/publication-ethics/icmje-authorship-criteria

Related methods

COPE Guidelines for Publication EthicsDuplicate Publication and Salami SlicingPeer Review ProcessPlagiarism in Academic Research

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • COPE Guidelines for Publication EthicsPublication Ethics↔ compare
  • Duplicate Publication and Salami SlicingPublication Ethics↔ compare
  • Peer Review ProcessPublication Ethics↔ compare
  • Plagiarism in Academic ResearchPublication Ethics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

COPE Guidelines for Publication EthicsDuplicate Publication and Salami SlicingPeer Review ProcessPlagiarism in Academic Research

Similar methods

COPE Guidelines for Publication EthicsArticle Retraction ProcessSelf-Plagiarism and Text RecyclingConflict of Interest in ResearchJournal Submission ProcessOriginal Research ArticlePredatory Journals and PublishersDuplicate Publication and Salami Slicing

Related reference concepts

CONSORT Statement and RCT ReportingSTROBE Statement and Observational Study ReportingCritical Appraisal and Individual Evidence EvaluationInformed ConsentGuideline Development and ImplementationInformed Consent and Autonomy

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — ICMJE Authorship Criteria (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authorship Criteria). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/publication-ethics/icmje-authorship-criteria · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Subfamily
authorship-standards
Year
1978
Type
Standard
Related methods
COPE Guidelines for Publication EthicsDuplicate Publication and Salami SlicingPeer Review ProcessPlagiarism in Academic Research
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account