Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Pain Medicine›Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
Process / pipelinepain acceptance and psychological flexibility

Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire

Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) · Also known as: CPAQ, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Pain Scale

The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) is a 20-item self-report instrument developed by McCracken in 1998 to measure pain acceptance—the willingness to experience pain while continuing with valued life activities. Unlike pain management approaches focused on pain reduction, the CPAQ operationalizes acceptance-based treatment philosophy grounded in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), measuring psychological flexibility in the context of chronic pain.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
Pain Anxiety Symptoms Sc…Pain Catastrophizing Sca…Pain Self-Efficacy Quest…Roland-Morris Disability…

When to use it

The CPAQ is indicated for assessment of chronic pain patients (all diagnoses) to measure psychological flexibility and readiness for acceptance-based interventions. It is particularly useful for identifying patients stuck in pain-avoidance cycles (low CPAQ scores) who would benefit from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy or mindfulness-based pain management. The CPAQ is ideal for tracking progress in ACT-based pain rehabilitation programs and research investigating acceptance-based mechanisms of pain disability reduction. The CPAQ is less appropriate for acute pain or immediate postoperative pain where focus on pain reduction is primary.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Operationalizes pain acceptance as distinct psychological construct with strong theoretical grounding in ACT and psychological flexibility models
  • Good psychometric properties: Cronbach's alpha ≥0.78-0.87 across subscales, test-retest reliability r ≥0.73-0.81, convergent validity with disability, depression, and functional outcomes
  • Responsive to change: CPAQ improves with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and mindfulness-based interventions; sensitive to acceptance-based treatment effects
  • Predicts treatment outcomes and long-term disability independent of pain intensity; high CPAQ at baseline predicts better functional prognosis
  • Brevity and availability; 8-item short form available for rapid screening; free and publicly available
Limitations
  • Measures willingness to experience pain but does not assess actual pain reduction; acceptance-based approach may not satisfy patients seeking pain elimination
  • Activity Engagement subscale overlaps conceptually with self-efficacy; CPAQ and PSEQ measure related but distinct constructs
  • Acceptance conceptualization may not align with all cultural frameworks; some populations emphasize pain elimination over psychological acceptance
  • Low CPAQ may reflect realistic assessment of activity limitations rather than maladaptive avoidance; clinical judgment needed to distinguish functional limitation from psychological avoidance

Frequently asked

Does pain acceptance mean giving up on pain reduction?

No. Pain acceptance is not resignation but a change in relationship to pain. Accepting pain means acknowledging it exists while continuing with valued activities—not waiting for pain elimination to resume living. Many patients pursue both pain reduction (medication, physical therapy) and pain acceptance (mindfulness, valued-living) simultaneously. Acceptance removes the struggle against pain that paradoxically increases suffering.

If a patient has low CPAQ, do they need ACT?

Low CPAQ suggests pain-avoidance patterns and low willingness to engage despite pain. These patients often benefit from acceptance-based interventions like ACT, but not exclusively—cognitive-behavioral therapy addressing fear-avoidance and catastrophizing, activity pacing, and pain education also build acceptance. Start with lowest-barrier intervention; if avoidance persists, escalate to ACT.

Can acceptance increase pain intensity?

No. Paradoxically, acceptance typically decreases experienced pain intensity over time. When patients stop fighting pain and avoiding activities, pain becomes less central to their identity, and neuroplastic changes occur through graded activity. Initial pain during activity exposure may increase, but overall pain intensity and disability typically decrease with acceptance-based treatment.

How long does it take to increase CPAQ scores?

CPAQ changes develop gradually during acceptance-based treatment. Expect small increases (5-10 points) over 4-6 weeks of ACT; substantial improvements (20-30 points) typically appear at 8-12 weeks. Some gains occur rapidly (first 2-4 weeks) as cognitive shifts occur; others take longer as behavioral habits change. Assess CPAQ every 2-4 weeks to track progress.

Sources

  1. McCracken, L.M. (1998). Learning to live with the pain: Acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain, 74(1), 21-27. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00146-2 ↗
  2. McCracken, L.M., & Vowles, K.E. (2006). Acceptance of chronic pain. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 10(2), 90-94. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-006-0018-y ↗
  3. Vowles, K.E., McCracken, L.M., & Eccleston, C. (2007). Processes of change in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 8(7), 556-562. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/pain-medicine/chronic-pain-acceptance-questionnaire

Related methods

Pain Anxiety Symptoms ScalePain Catastrophizing ScalePain Self-Efficacy QuestionnaireRoland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Pain Anxiety Symptoms ScalePain Medicine↔ compare
  • Pain Catastrophizing ScalePain Medicine↔ compare
  • Pain Self-Efficacy QuestionnairePain Medicine↔ compare
  • Roland-Morris Disability QuestionnairePain Medicine↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Pain Anxiety Symptoms ScalePain Self-Efficacy QuestionnaireRoland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

Similar methods

Pain Anxiety Symptoms ScaleAcceptance and Commitment TherapyPain Self-Efficacy QuestionnaireFive Facet Mindfulness QuestionnairePain Catastrophizing ScalePhiladelphia Mindfulness ScaleMcGill Pain QuestionnaireDallas Pain Questionnaire

Related reference concepts

Pain Management and Chronic PainAcceptance and Commitment TherapyPain Assessment and MeasurementPain Assessment and MeasurementBehavioral & Psychological Treatmentof Physical IllnessMusculoskeletal Pain Assessment

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/pain-medicine/chronic-pain-acceptance-questionnaire · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Lance M. McCracken
Subfamily
pain acceptance and psychological flexibility
Year
1998
Type
Self-report questionnaire measuring pain acceptance and behavioral engagement
Related methods
Pain Anxiety Symptoms ScalePain Catastrophizing ScalePain Self-Efficacy QuestionnaireRoland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account