Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Optics›Mueller-Stokes Calculus
Process / pipelinePolarization

Mueller-Stokes Calculus

Mueller-Stokes Calculus for Polarization · Also known as: Mueller matrix method, Stokes parameters, Mueller calculus

Mueller-Stokes calculus is a mathematical framework for describing and analyzing the polarization properties of light, including partially polarized and unpolarized light. Grounded in George Gabriel Stokes' 1852 work on polarization parameters and extended by Hans Mueller in 1948, this formalism uses the four-component Stokes vector and the 4×4 Mueller matrix to track how optical systems transform polarization states.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Mueller-Stokes Calculus
Fourier OpticsInterferogram Fringe Ana…Jones Calculus

When to use it

Use Mueller-Stokes calculus whenever you encounter partially polarized, unpolarized, or incoherent light. It is essential for polarimetry, depolarization analysis, and optical systems with losses or statistical effects. Jones calculus is faster for fully polarized light; Mueller-Stokes is more general and physically complete.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Handles fully, partially, and unpolarized light in a unified framework
  • Natural treatment of depolarization and intensity losses
  • Applicable to incoherent and statistical optical systems
  • Stokes parameters are directly measurable with standard instrumentation
  • Mueller matrices are real-valued, avoiding complex arithmetic
Limitations
  • Mueller calculus is not unique: multiple Mueller matrices can represent the same physical transformation
  • Computational cost is higher than Jones calculus (4×4 versus 2×2 matrices)
  • Interpretation of Mueller matrix elements is less intuitive than Jones matrices
  • Not all 4×4 real matrices are valid Mueller matrices; physical constraints apply

Frequently asked

What are Stokes parameters, and how do I measure them?

Stokes parameters [S_0; S_1; S_2; S_3] are measured intensities: S_0 = total intensity, S_1 = horizontal minus vertical, S_2 = diagonal minus antidiagonal, S_3 = right-circular minus left-circular intensity. They are measured using a combination of linear polarizers, retarders, and intensity detectors at different angles.

What is the degree of polarization, and why does it matter?

The degree of polarization is P = sqrt(S_1² + S_2² + S_3²) / S_0, ranging from 0 (unpolarized) to 1 (fully polarized). It quantifies the fraction of the beam that is polarized. Partially polarized light (0 < P < 1) is a statistical mixture of polarized and unpolarized components.

How do I convert a Jones matrix to a Mueller matrix?

A Mueller matrix M can be derived from a Jones matrix J via M = 0.5 Re(J ⊗ J*), where ⊗ is the Kronecker product. However, not all Mueller matrices correspond to unique Jones matrices; only non-depolarizing Mueller matrices have an inverse conversion.

What constraints must a Mueller matrix satisfy to be physical?

A Mueller matrix must satisfy several conditions: (1) the (1,1) element (total transmission) must be largest, (2) the eigenvalues of the coherency matrix must satisfy certain inequalities (Hermitian constraints), and (3) depolarization cannot exceed the total intensity. Violations indicate non-physical or incorrectly measured matrices.

Sources

  1. Stokes, G. G. (1852). On the composition and resolution of streams of polarized light from different sources. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 9, 399-416. link ↗
  2. Mueller, H. (1948). The foundations of optics. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 38(8), 661-644. link ↗
  3. Goldstein, D. H. (2003). Polarized Light (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Mueller-Stokes Calculus for Polarization. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/optics/mueller-stokes-calculus

Related methods

Fourier OpticsInterferogram Fringe AnalysisJones Calculus

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Fourier OpticsOptics↔ compare
  • Interferogram Fringe AnalysisOptics↔ compare
  • Jones CalculusOptics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Interferogram Fringe AnalysisJones Calculus

Similar methods

Jones CalculusInterferogram Fringe AnalysisABCD MatrixS-Parameter AnalysisFourier OpticsSAR Image AnalysisQuaternion AttitudeRaman Deconvolution

Related reference concepts

States of PolarizationPolarization of LightPolarizers and Wave PlatesAstronomical PolarimetersPlane Waves and PolarizationReflection and the Fresnel Equations

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Mueller-Stokes Calculus (Mueller-Stokes Calculus for Polarization). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/optics/mueller-stokes-calculus · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
George Gabriel Stokes and Hans Mueller
Subfamily
Polarization
Year
1852
Type
Vector-matrix formalism
Related methods
Fourier OpticsInterferogram Fringe AnalysisJones Calculus
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account