Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Materials Science›X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Process / pipelineSurface spectroscopy

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) · Also known as: XPS, ESCA, electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), also known as Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA), is a surface-sensitive analytical technique that measures the kinetic energies of photoelectrons ejected from a material by high-energy X-rays. Developed by Kai Siegbahn in 1967, XPS determines elemental composition, chemical oxidation states, and chemical bonding within ~10 nanometers of a surface. It is indispensable in materials science for surface characterization, corrosion studies, oxide analysis, and interface chemistry.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Energy-Dispersive X-ray…Raman DeconvolutionSelected Area Electron D…XRD Rietveld Refinement

When to use it

XPS is ideal for determining surface elemental composition, oxidation states, and identifying chemical compounds on surfaces. Apply to oxides, sulfides, nitrides, and organic layers. Depth profiling by ion sputtering resolves compositional gradients. Avoid for bulk analysis (use ICP-MS) or subsurface features requiring atomic resolution (use STM). Most effective for elements with Z > 3 (above helium); hydrogen and helium cannot be reliably detected.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Directly measures binding energy, enabling identification of elemental oxidation states and chemical bonding
  • Quantitative elemental concentrations from peak areas and sensitivity factors; typically ±10% accuracy
  • Surface-sensitive due to ~1-3 nm photoelectron escape depth, ideal for oxide and interface analysis
  • Non-destructive for initial survey; ion sputtering enables depth profiling
  • Excellent for differentiating similar elements or different oxidation states of same element
Limitations
  • Surface-sensitive only; subsurface structures require destructive depth profiling
  • Light elements (H, He, Li) cannot be detected; poor sensitivity for low-Z elements
  • Charging effects on insulating samples distort binding energies; grounding or flood-gun compensation needed
  • Quantitative analysis requires sensitivity factors and standard samples; relative accuracy ~10-15%
  • Photoelectron peak widths limit chemical shift resolution; closely-spaced oxidation states may not resolve

Frequently asked

What is the difference between XPS and Auger spectroscopy?

XPS measures photoelectrons ejected by X-rays; Auger spectroscopy measures electrons from Auger processes after electron-beam ionization. XPS is more surface-sensitive and gives better elemental resolution; Auger is spatially localized (useful with SEM). Both require ultra-high vacuum.

How do I correct for charging on insulating samples?

Standard approaches: apply a conductive overlay (carbon, gold), use charge-neutralization floods, or calibrate using standard samples. Flood guns emit low-energy electrons to neutralize positive charges from photoelectron loss.

What does a chemical shift mean in XPS?

A chemical shift is a change in binding energy due to the chemical environment of the atom. For example, Fe3+ has higher binding energy than Fe2+ because more positive charge increases electron binding. Shifts of 1-10 eV distinguish oxidation states and bonding environments.

Can XPS be used for depth profiling?

Yes, with ion sputtering: alternately sputter thin layers and measure XPS to build a depth profile. This reveals compositional gradients and interface structure but is destructive and requires careful interpretation for reactive materials.

Sources

  1. Siegbahn, K., Nordling, C., Fahlman, A., et al. (1967). ESCA: Atomic, Molecular and Solid State Structure Studied by Means of Electron Spectroscopy. Almqvist and Wiksells. link ↗
  2. Briggs, D., & Seah, M. P. (2003). Practical Surface Analysis by Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
  3. Moulder, J. F., Stickle, W. F., Sobol, P. E., & Bomben, K. D. (1992). Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Physical Electronics. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/materials-science/x-ray-photoelectron-spectroscopy

Related methods

Energy-Dispersive X-ray SpectroscopyRaman DeconvolutionSelected Area Electron Diffraction

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Energy-Dispersive X-ray SpectroscopyMaterials Science↔ compare
  • Raman DeconvolutionMaterials Science↔ compare
  • Selected Area Electron DiffractionMaterials Science↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Energy-Dispersive X-ray SpectroscopyRaman DeconvolutionXRD Rietveld Refinement

Similar methods

Energy-Dispersive X-ray SpectroscopyXANESEXAFSXRD Rietveld RefinementAtomic Force MicroscopyX-Ray CrystallographyElectron Paramagnetic ResonanceBET Surface Area

Related reference concepts

Spectroscopic Materials CharacterizationMaterials CharacterizationElectron Microscopy of MaterialsElectron Microprobe and MicroanalysisDiffraction Methods for MaterialsElectronic Structure and Density Functional Theory

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/materials-science/x-ray-photoelectron-spectroscopy · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Kai Siegbahn
Subfamily
Surface spectroscopy
Year
1967
Type
Analytical technique
Related methods
Energy-Dispersive X-ray SpectroscopyRaman DeconvolutionSelected Area Electron Diffraction
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account