Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Materials Science›Nanoindentation
Process / pipelineMechanical testing

Nanoindentation

Nanoindentation Hardness Testing · Also known as: nanoindentation, instrumented indentation, depth-sensing indentation

Nanoindentation, or instrumented indentation, is a technique for measuring the hardness and elastic modulus of materials by pressing a hard probe into a sample surface and continuously recording load and penetration depth. Developed by Oliver and Pharr in 1992, nanoindentation enables measurement of mechanical properties of thin films, small volumes, and nanoscale structures with spatial resolution approaching micrometers. It is the standard tool in materials science for characterizing coatings, interfaces, and mechanical properties at the submicron scale.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Nanoindentation
Atomic Force MicroscopyDynamic Light ScatteringVickers Hardness

When to use it

Nanoindentation is essential for measuring mechanical properties of thin films, coatings, and small volumes where traditional hardness tests fail. Apply to films <1 micrometer, small grains, and interfaces requiring spatial resolution. Most accurate for load range 0.1-10 mN (deeper for soft materials, shallower for hard ceramics). Less suitable for very compliant materials (metals <0.1 GPa) or rough surfaces.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Measures both hardness and elastic modulus in single test; requires no post-test surface analysis
  • Spatial resolution approaching micrometers enables grain-level or interface-specific measurements
  • Non-destructive for mapping (multiple indents with small displacement); continuous probe control provides feedback
  • Works on coatings, thin films, and small structural features inaccessible to macro-scale testing
  • Minimal sample preparation required; can test in-situ or ex-situ
Limitations
  • Probe area calibration critical; small errors (±5%) propagate to hardness measurements
  • Surface roughness, sample compliance, and tip geometry affect absolute values; relative measurements more reliable
  • Indentation size effect (hardness decreases with depth at shallow indents <100 nm); interpretation requires care
  • Substrate effects for films <100 nm; apparent properties are weighted average of film + substrate
  • Does not measure fracture toughness directly; requires specialized indent geometries and analysis

Frequently asked

What is the Oliver-Pharr method and why is it used?

The Oliver-Pharr method extracts hardness and modulus from load-displacement curves using the unloading stiffness and contact area. It is the industry standard because it provides repeatable, reference-independent results without needing optical microscopy (though final check recommended).

What is indentation size effect and how do I correct for it?

ISE is the decrease in apparent hardness at shallow indents, typically below 100 nm depth. Causes include strain gradients, tip geometry variations, and surface roughness effects. Corrections include extrapolating to infinite depth or using strain-gradient plasticity models.

How do I measure mechanical properties of coatings without substrate contribution?

Indent to <10% of film thickness to minimize substrate contribution. For thinner films, use substrate-independent methods: measure multiple load levels and extrapolate, or use composite modulus models accounting for film/substrate stiffness weighting.

Can nanoindentation measure fracture toughness?

Not directly from standard indentation. Specialized geometries (Vickers indents for crack-based methods) and post-indent SEM observation of crack lengths enable estimates, but accuracy is limited. More robust: use dedicated fracture tests.

Sources

  1. Oliver, W. C., & Pharr, G. M. (1992). An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. Journal of Materials Research, 7(6), 1564-1583. DOI: 10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
  2. Fischer-Cripps, A. C. (2004). Nanoindentation (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. link ↗
  3. Hay, J. L., & Crawford, B. (2011). Measuring substrate-independent modulus of thin films. Journal of Materials Research, 26(6), 727-738. DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2011.8 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Nanoindentation Hardness Testing. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/materials-science/nanoindentation

Related methods

Atomic Force MicroscopyDynamic Light ScatteringVickers Hardness

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Atomic Force MicroscopyMaterials Science↔ compare
  • Dynamic Light ScatteringMaterials Science↔ compare
  • Vickers HardnessMaterials Science↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Atomic Force MicroscopyVickers Hardness

Similar methods

Vickers HardnessAtomic Force MicroscopyEnergy-Dispersive X-ray SpectroscopyMolecular DynamicsJanka HardnessSelected Area Electron DiffractionGriffith Fracture MechanicsDynamic Mechanical Analysis

Related reference concepts

Materials CharacterizationElectron Microscopy of MaterialsDiffraction Methods for MaterialsElasticity and Stress-StrainSpectroscopic Materials CharacterizationTwo-Dimensional Materials

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Nanoindentation (Nanoindentation Hardness Testing). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/materials-science/nanoindentation · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Warren Oliver
Subfamily
Mechanical testing
Year
1992
Type
Measurement method
Related methods
Atomic Force MicroscopyDynamic Light ScatteringVickers Hardness
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account