ScholarGate
Assistant
MCDMGame-theoretic / formal IR

Crisis Bargaining Game

A crisis bargaining game is a formal, usually extensive-form model in which two states sequentially choose to challenge, escalate, stand firm, or back down during an international dispute, and the analyst solves for the equilibrium pattern of escalation and concession. Building on Schelling's strategy of conflict and given an influential treatment in Fearon's (1994) model of escalation as a war of attrition, these games make explicit how incomplete information about each side's resolve, and the costs each pays for backing down, shape whether a crisis ends in mutual accommodation, capitulation, or war.

Open in MethodMindSoonApply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore
VideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Sources

  1. Fearon, J. D. (1994). Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592. DOI: 10.2307/2944796

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Game-Theoretic Models of International Crisis Bargaining. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/international-relations/crisis-bargaining-game

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

Referenced by

ScholarGateCrisis Bargaining Game (Game-Theoretic Models of International Crisis Bargaining). Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/international-relations/crisis-bargaining-game · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026