Bargaining Model of War
The bargaining model of war, given its canonical statement by James Fearon in 'Rationalist Explanations for War' (1995), treats war not as the failure of reason but as a failure of bargaining. Because fighting is costly and uncertain, there almost always exists a peaceful division of the disputed stakes that both rational states would prefer to the gamble of war. The puzzle, and the model's central contribution, is to identify the specific conditions — private information with incentives to misrepresent, commitment problems, and issue indivisibility — under which rational, unitary states nonetheless fail to reach such a settlement.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379–414. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300033324 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Rationalist Bargaining Model of War (Fearon). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/international-relations/bargaining-model-of-war
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Audience Cost AnalysisInternational Relations↔ compare
- Crisis Bargaining GameInternational Relations↔ compare
- Expected Utility Model of WarInternational Relations↔ compare