Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Geophysics›Electrical Resistivity Tomography
Process / pipelineElectromagnetic inversion

Electrical Resistivity Tomography

Also known as: ERT

Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is an active-source geophysical method that maps the spatial distribution of electrical resistivity in the subsurface by injecting current between two electrodes and measuring potential differences across an array of receiver electrodes. Advanced as a practical technique by Loke and Barker in 1996, ERT has become standard for hydrogeological, environmental, and structural characterization due to its sensitivity to fluid saturation and salt content.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Electrical Resistivity Tomography
Ground-Penetrating RadarMagnetotelluricsSeismic Full-Waveform In…HEC-RAS

When to use it

ERT is excellent for detecting groundwater saturation, mapping aquifer boundaries, and monitoring contaminant transport in environmental investigations. It is also useful for landslide hazard assessment, cavity detection, and geotechnical site characterization. Resistivity contrasts must be sufficient (typically >2:1) for ERT to resolve features. Combine ERT with seismic or borehole data for multi-parameter interpretation.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Excellent sensitivity to fluid saturation and ionic content, directly reflecting hydrogeological and contaminant conditions
  • Flexible array geometries and electrode spacing allow targeting of specific depth ranges
  • Can be deployed on surface, in boreholes, or in mines for flexible 2D/3D investigations
  • High data density (hundreds to thousands of measurements) enable detailed spatial resolution
Limitations
  • Sensitivity decreases with depth; deeper structures require longer electrode spacings but lose lateral resolution
  • Interpretation is non-unique; different resistivity distributions can produce nearly identical data
  • High-conductivity surface layers (wet clay, salt) attenuate signals and obscure deeper structures
  • Inversion algorithms are computationally demanding for large 3D datasets and may require damping to remain stable

Frequently asked

What is the difference between ERT and traditional vertical electrical sounding (VES)?

VES injects current at one pair of locations and measures potential at progressively larger electrode spacings, creating a 1D resistivity profile at one horizontal location. ERT uses fixed electrode arrays with multiple current injections and dense measurements, creating 2D or 3D resistivity distributions. ERT provides lateral structure; VES provides depth detail at a single point.

How deep can ERT investigate?

Approximate maximum depth is one-quarter to one-third of the total electrode array length. For a 100 m array, expect reliable imaging to 25–33 m. Achieving greater depth requires longer arrays, which increases survey time and cost. Borehole-based ERT can image deeper structures with shorter surface arrays.

How long does an ERT survey take?

Survey time depends on array length, number of electrodes, and the inversion software. A 1D sounding with 10–15 electrode spacings takes 30 minutes to 1 hour. A 2D profile with 48–64 electrodes can take 1–3 hours. 3D surveys can require many hours to days depending on spatial coverage and measurement density.

What electrode spacing should I use?

Electrode spacing is chosen based on the target depth and lateral resolution required. Smaller spacing (<1 m) resolves shallow features; larger spacing (>5 m) targets deeper structures but with reduced lateral resolution. Common spacings for hydrogeological investigations range from 2–10 m.

Sources

  1. Loke, M. H., & Barker, R. D. (1996). Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(1), 131-152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x ↗
  2. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., & Sheriff, R. E. (1990). Applied geophysics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Electrical Resistivity Tomography. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/geophysics/electrical-resistivity-tomography

Related methods

Ground-Penetrating RadarMagnetotelluricsSeismic Full-Waveform Inversion

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Ground-Penetrating RadarGeophysics↔ compare
  • MagnetotelluricsGeophysics↔ compare
  • Seismic Full-Waveform InversionGeophysics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Ground-Penetrating RadarHEC-RASMagnetotellurics

Similar methods

MagnetotelluricsGround-Penetrating RadarHydrogeological SurveyGeophysical InversionWell Log AnalysisAmbient Noise TomographySeismic Reflection InterpretationGeologic Mapping

Related reference concepts

Electrical and Electromagnetic MethodsNear-Surface and Environmental GeophysicsExploration GeophysicsGeophysical Survey MethodsApplied Geophysical SurveyingGeophysics

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Electrical Resistivity Tomography (Electrical Resistivity Tomography). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/geophysics/electrical-resistivity-tomography · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Loke and Barker
Subfamily
Electromagnetic inversion
Year
1996
Type
Active source resistivity mapping and subsurface imaging
Related methods
Ground-Penetrating RadarMagnetotelluricsSeismic Full-Waveform Inversion
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account