Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Experimental design›Pilot Solomon Four-Group Design — Experimental Design Feasibility Study
Process / pipelineExperimental design

Pilot Solomon Four-Group Design — Experimental Design Feasibility Study

Pilot Solomon Four-Group Experimental Design · Also known as: Pilot S4GD, Solomon four-group pilot study, pilot four-group pretest-posttest control design, pilot SFGD

The Pilot Solomon Four-Group Design is a small-scale, preliminary implementation of the Solomon four-group experimental design. Its purpose is to test the feasibility and logistics of the full design before committing to a resource-intensive main study. The Solomon four-group design, introduced by Richard L. Solomon in 1949, controls for pretest sensitisation by using four groups — two that receive a pretest and two that do not — crossed with treatment and control conditions. Piloting this design allows researchers to estimate effect sizes, detect procedural problems, and verify that the pretest does not unduly influence posttest scores.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Pilot Solomon Four-Group Design
Full Factorial DesignRandomized Controlled Tr…Solomon Four-Group Design

When to use it

Use a Pilot Solomon Four-Group Design when you plan a main study using the Solomon four-group design and need to verify feasibility before full deployment — especially when the intervention is novel, the measurement instruments are untested in the target population, or participant attrition across four groups is a concern. It is particularly valuable when the research question requires distinguishing pretest sensitisation from genuine treatment effects. Do not use this design if you cannot recruit enough participants even for a small-scale pilot (fewer than 8 per cell makes estimates unreliable), if the intervention cannot be withheld from half the participants for ethical reasons, or if a simpler two-group pilot design is sufficient to answer your feasibility questions.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Identifies and quantifies pretest sensitisation before it contaminates the main study, enabling better instrument selection.
  • Provides realistic estimates of attrition, effect size, and variance needed for accurate main-study power calculations.
  • Tests all procedural elements — randomisation, blinding, instrument administration, and intervention delivery — in a controlled, low-stakes environment.
  • Produces a structured feasibility decision point that protects the main study investment from foreseeable procedural failures.
  • Aligns with open-science norms by pre-registering the pilot and its role in the main study design.
Limitations
  • Requires a substantially larger participant pool than a two-group pilot, increasing recruitment burden and cost.
  • Small cell sizes in the pilot may yield imprecise pretest-sensitisation estimates, potentially misleading the power calculation.
  • The pilot sample must not overlap with the main study, which can deplete available participants in small or specialised populations.
  • Logistical complexity — coordinating four groups with and without pretests — increases risk of protocol deviations that may not occur at scale.

Frequently asked

How is a pilot Solomon four-group design different from just piloting a pretest-posttest design?

A standard pretest-posttest pilot tests only two groups — treatment and control — both with pretests. It cannot detect whether the pretest itself is influencing posttest scores. The Solomon four-group pilot specifically adds two no-pretest groups, allowing the researcher to estimate and separate pretest sensitisation effects before those effects contaminate the main study results.

How many participants do I need per cell in the pilot?

A common recommendation is 10–15 participants per cell to obtain useful feasibility estimates, though some methodologists accept as few as 8. With fewer than 8 per cell the variance estimates are too unstable to inform main-study power calculations reliably. The pilot is not powered to detect the treatment effect itself — it is powered to estimate variance, attrition, and sensitisation effect magnitude.

Can I use the pilot data in my main study analysis?

No. Pilot participants must be excluded from the main study dataset. Including them inflates the effective sample size in ways not accounted for by the pre-registered power calculation and introduces potential bias if procedural adjustments were made between the pilot and main study. Report pilot results separately and transparently.

What statistical analysis should I run on the pilot data?

At minimum, run a 2×2 ANOVA on the posttest scores with pretest presence (yes/no) and treatment condition (treatment/control) as factors. The interaction term estimates the pretest sensitisation effect. Also compute descriptive statistics for each cell, estimate effect size (Cohen's d or eta-squared), and calculate observed variance for the main-study power calculation.

When should I decide that the Solomon four-group design is too complex for my study?

If the pilot reveals that maintaining four distinct groups causes severe ethical problems (treatment cannot be withheld), that attrition in the no-pretest groups is unacceptably high, or that the available population cannot sustain four separate cells in the main study, consider simplifying to a two-group randomised design with a sensitivity analysis for pretest effects. The pilot's job is precisely to surface this kind of decision.

Sources

  1. Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI: 10.1037/h0062958 ↗
  2. Braver, M. C. W., & Braver, S. L. (1988). Statistical treatment of the Solomon four-group design: A meta-analytic approach. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 150–154. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.150 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Pilot Solomon Four-Group Experimental Design. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/experimental-design/pilot-solomon-four-group-design

Related methods

Full Factorial DesignRandomized Controlled TrialSolomon Four-Group Design

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Full Factorial DesignExperimental design↔ compare
  • Randomized Controlled TrialExperimental design↔ compare
  • Solomon Four-Group DesignExperimental design↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

Solomon Four-Group DesignPragmatic Solomon Four-Group DesignDouble-blind Solomon four-group designBlocked Solomon Four-Group DesignCrossover Solomon Four-Group DesignAdaptive Solomon Four-Group DesignPilot pretest-posttest experimental designCluster Randomized Solomon Four-Group Design

Related reference concepts

Sample Size CalculationRandomized Controlled TrialPretestingPretests PosttestsStatistical Power and Sample SizeStudy Design and Sample Size Planning

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Pilot Solomon Four-Group Design (Pilot Solomon Four-Group Experimental Design). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/experimental-design/pilot-solomon-four-group-design · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Richard L. Solomon (base design); pilot application is a standard methodological practice
Year
1949 (Solomon design); pilot usage documented in experimental methodology literature from 1960s onward
Type
Experimental design — pilot phase
DataType
Continuous or categorical outcome measures; pretest and posttest scores
Subfamily
Experimental design
Related methods
Full Factorial DesignRandomized Controlled TrialSolomon Four-Group Design
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account