Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
TAM2 Questionnaire/Evidence
Method evidence record

TAM2 Questionnaire

The Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2) was developed by Davis and Venkatesh in 2000 and published in Management Science. TAM2 extends the original TAM by incorporating social influence factors and job relevance moderators that explain how users form perceived usefulness beliefs. TAM2 is grounded in longitudinal field studies across multiple organizational contexts and systems.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2) Questionnaire
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / information-systems
  • Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Two experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 23-45. · DOI 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. · DOI 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketDeLone and McLean IS Success Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketTechnology Acceptance Model Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketTechnology Readiness Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketUTAUT Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account