Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Speech Act Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

Speech Act Analysis

Speech act analysis is the empirical, qualitative method of examining real utterances for the actions they perform — promising, requesting, apologizing, warning, declaring — rather than merely for what they describe. Building on J. L. Austin's insight that saying is doing and on John Searle's systematic taxonomy of illocutionary acts, the analyst segments discourse into utterances, identifies the illocutionary force of each, classifies it (as a representative, directive, commissive, expressive, or declaration), and notes whether the act is performed directly or indirectly. It turns the philosophy of language into a coding procedure that can be applied to conversations, written texts, and elicited data.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Speech Act Analysis in Pragmatics
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / linguistics
  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. · ISBN 9780198245537
  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521096263
  • Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. · DOI 10.1017/S0047404500006837
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyConversation Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCritical Discourse Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyDiscourse Completion Taskmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySystemic Functional Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account