Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling/Evidence
Method evidence record

Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling

Self-plagiarism, or text recycling, occurs when an author reuses substantial portions of their own previously published work in a new publication without disclosure or acknowledgment. This includes republishing the same article in different venues, duplicating methods sections across multiple papers, or reusing discussion sections. While the intellectual property is the author's own, self-plagiarism is considered misconduct because it violates the principle that published work represents new research and it may inflate publication counts.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling: Reusing One's Own Previously Published Work Without Disclosure
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / research-ethics
  • Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. · URL
  • Research Integrity Journal. (2022). Salami publishing and duplicate submission: A systematic review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8, 1-12. · URL
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2023). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 330(6), 567-575. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketSimilarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the Distinctionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketVerbatim Plagiarismmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account