Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Risk-adjusted cross-sectional epidemiological study/Evidence
Method evidence record

Risk-adjusted cross-sectional epidemiological study

A risk-adjusted cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the prevalence of health outcomes or exposures in a defined population at a single point in time, then applies statistical risk-adjustment methods — such as regression standardization, direct or indirect standardization, or propensity scoring — to remove the distorting influence of differences in patient case-mix across comparison groups. The approach is widely used in health services research, comparative effectiveness, and clinical quality assessment.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Risk-Adjusted Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / epidemiology
  • Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. · ISBN 978-0195083385
  • Iezzoni, L. I. (Ed.). (2003). Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes (3rd ed.). Health Administration Press. · ISBN 978-1567932140
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketCase-control studymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyLogistic Regressionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMultilevel Modelingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPropensity Score Matchingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account