Queer Methodology
Queer methodology is less a fixed technique than a critical stance toward research that disrupts taken-for-granted categories of sex, gender, and sexuality and resists the assumption that identities are stable, knowable, and countable. Articulated for the social sciences in Kath Browne and Catherine Nash's Queer Methods and Methodologies (2010) and prefigured in Jack Halberstam's notion of a 'scavenger' methodology, it asks not 'what is the right method?' but 'how does research itself reproduce normativity?' — and licenses researchers to borrow and combine methods rhizomatically in order to attend to fluidity, ambiguity, and the very production of the normal.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.) (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Ashgate, Surrey. · ISBN 9780754678434
- Halberstam, J. (1998). Female Masculinity. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. · ISBN 9780822322436
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.