Queer Methodology
Queer methodology is less a fixed technique than a critical stance toward research that disrupts taken-for-granted categories of sex, gender, and sexuality and resists the assumption that identities are stable, knowable, and countable. Articulated for the social sciences in Kath Browne and Catherine Nash's Queer Methods and Methodologies (2010) and prefigured in Jack Halberstam's notion of a 'scavenger' methodology, it asks not 'what is the right method?' but 'how does research itself reproduce normativity?' — and licenses researchers to borrow and combine methods rhizomatically in order to attend to fluidity, ambiguity, and the very production of the normal.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.) (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Ashgate, Surrey. ISBN: 9780754678434
- Halberstam, J. (1998). Female Masculinity. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. ISBN: 9780822322436
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Queer Methods and Methodologies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/gender-studies/queer-methodology
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Critical Discourse AnalysisQualitative↔ compare
- Feminist Standpoint AnalysisGender Studies↔ compare
- Intersectionality AnalysisGender Studies↔ compare
- Narrative AnalysisQualitative↔ compare