Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Price Fairness Scale/Evidence
Method evidence record

Price Fairness Scale

The Price Fairness Scale (PFS), developed by Xia, Monroe, and Cox (2004), measures customer perception of whether a charged price is fair and reasonable relative to value received and market comparison. Price fairness assessment differs from absolute price satisfaction: customers may perceive a price as high but fair if quality justifies it, or as low but unfair if they suspect price discrimination or exploitation. The PFS captures three dimensions of price fairness judgment: Distributive Fairness (whether the price-value ratio is equitable), Procedural Fairness (whether the pricing process is transparent and non-discriminatory), and Interactional Fairness (whether pricing explanations are respectful). The scale is critical for premium pricing strategy, price increases, and dynamic pricing implementation.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Price Fairness Scale (PFS)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / marketing-management
  • Campbell, M. C. (2005). Perceived Price Fairness. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 30-35. · URL
  • Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The Price is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda on Perceived Price Fairness. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1-15. · DOI 10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyAmerican Customer Satisfaction Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBrand Equity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCustomer Loyalty Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account