Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study
A multicenter diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test (e.g., a biomarker, imaging modality, or clinical prediction rule) identifies a target condition when conducted across two or more independent clinical sites. By recruiting patients from diverse settings, it produces estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios that are more externally valid than those obtained from a single center, and it enables explicit assessment of how test performance varies across sites, patient populations, and operator skill levels.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., Kressel, H. Y., Rifai, N., Golub, R. M., Altman, D. G., Hooft, L., Korevaar, D. A., & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. · DOI 10.1136/bmj.h5527
- Rutjes, A. W. S., Reitsma, J. B., Coomarasamy, A., Khan, K. S., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2006). Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard: A review of methods. Health Technology Assessment, 10(50), iii–iv, 1–121. · DOI 10.3310/hta11500
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.