Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Language Attitude Survey/Evidence
Method evidence record

Language Attitude Survey

A direct language attitude survey measures what people think and feel about languages, dialects, and varieties by asking them explicitly. Using questionnaires built from Likert scales, semantic-differential items, and open-ended questions, the direct approach gathers respondents' self-reported evaluations of varieties — their prestige, beauty, usefulness, or appropriateness — and analyses these responses for reliability, underlying structure, and differences between social groups. It is the self-report counterpart to indirect techniques such as the matched-guise test, trading some protection against socially desirable answers for transparency, scale, and ease of administration.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Direct Language Attitude Survey
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / linguistics
  • Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to Language. Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521759175
  • Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and Language. Multilingual Matters. · ISBN 9781853591419
  • Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement (New ed.). Pinter. · ISBN 9781855670440
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyMatched-Guise Techniquemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.See alsoSemantic Differentialmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVariationist Sociolinguisticsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVerbal-Guise Techniquemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account