Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale/Evidence
Method evidence record

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, published by Max Hamilton in 1960, is a clinician-administered interview assessment of depressive symptom severity. The most common version contains 17 items (HAM-D-17), though 21-item and 24-item versions exist. It is considered the gold standard outcome measure in antidepressant drug trials and remains the most cited depression rating scale in the psychiatric literature. Unlike self-report measures, HAM-D requires clinician judgment and observation, making it particularly valuable in research settings where standardized measurement by trained raters is essential.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-item HDRS or HAM-D)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / clinical-psychology
  • Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 23(1), 56–62. · DOI 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
  • Bagby, R. M., Ryder, A. G., Schuller, D. R., & Marshall, M. B. (1997). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight? American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(12), 2163–2177. · DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2163
  • Williams, J. B. (1988). A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45(8), 742–747. · DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyBeck Depression Inventory-IImachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyClinical Global Impressions Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketMontgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPatient Health Questionnaire-9machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyQuick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account