Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
ALPPQ/Evidence
Method evidence record

ALPPQ

The Hair Loss Impact Questionnaire (Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes Questionnaire, ALPPQ) is a disease-specific, patient-administered quality-of-life measure assessing the psychosocial and functional burden of alopecia areata, a chronic autoimmune disorder causing patchy hair loss. Alopecia areata affects appearance, self-esteem, and social functioning disproportionately, often causing depression and anxiety. The ALPPQ captures these impacts, ensuring that treatment efficacy encompasses meaningful quality-of-life outcomes. It is increasingly used in clinical trials and observational studies of alopecia areata therapeutics.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes Questionnaire
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / dermatology
  • Gupta AK, Talukder M. Alopecia areata: autoimmune basis of hair loss and available treatment options. Can J Dermatol. 2014;12(5):289-304. · URL
  • Strober BE, Mengesha YM, Clay FJ, et al. Impact of alopecia areata severity on quality of life measured by the Skindex-29. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52(3):S45. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketAcne-QoLmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyChildren's DLQImachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPOEMmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySkindex-29machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account