Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
TICS/Evidence
Method evidence record

TICS

The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) is a telephone-administered cognitive screening instrument developed by Breitner and colleagues in the late 1980s and modified (TICS-m) to assess cognitive function in older adults via remote interview. Designed for epidemiological studies and clinical research where in-person assessment is impractical or resource-intensive, the TICS combines questions assessing orientation, attention, language, memory, and reasoning in a format suitable for administration by trained interviewers without specialized clinical equipment. It has become widely used in longitudinal cohort studies, clinical trials, and telemedicine settings for cognitive screening and monitoring.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / gerontology
  • Breitner, J. C., Folstein, M. F., & Murphy, E. A. (1989). Familial aggregation in Alzheimer dementia: comparison of risk estimates. Genet Epidemiol, 6(1), 35-45. · URL
  • Plassman, B. L., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Bigler, E. D., et al. (2007). Telephone assessment of cognitive function in older adults: the Adult Changes in Thought Study. Neuroepidemiology, 27(2), 92-100. · URL
  • Breitner, J. C. S., Wyse, B. W., Anthony, J. C., et al. (1999). APOE-epsilon4 count predicts age when prevalence of AD increases, then declines: the Cache County Study. Neurology, 53(2), 321-331. · DOI 10.1212/WNL.53.2.321
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyEFSmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyFRAILmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGAImachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyLSAmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySESmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account