Method evidence record
Cluster Randomized Trial
A cluster randomized trial (CRT) randomizes intact groups—schools, clinics, villages, or hospital wards—rather than individuals. Developed by Campbell, Grimshaw, and colleagues in the late 1990s to address real-world settings where intervention delivery or contamination occurs at the group level, CRTs are now standard for evaluating population-level, community-based, and policy interventions.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (CRT)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / clinical-research
- Campbell, M. K., Grimshaw, J. M., & Elbourne, D. R. (2000). Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 30. · URL
- Eldridge, S. M., Ashmore, S., Frenkel, S., Cryer, C., & Underwood, M. (2006). Uncertainty in analyses of safety after cluster randomization. Clinical Trials, 3(2), 152–162. · URL
- Campbell, M. K., Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., & Altman, D. G. (2012). Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ, 345, e5661. · DOI 10.1136/bmj.e5661
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
No curated claims yet
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.