Bland-Altman Analysis
The Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
- Giavarina, D. (2015). Understanding Bland Altman Analysis. Biochemia Medica, 25(2), 141–151. · DOI 10.11613/BM.2015.015
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.