Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Adaptive A/B test/Evidence
Method evidence record

Adaptive A/B test

An Adaptive A/B test is an experimental design that dynamically reallocates traffic or participants toward better-performing variants during the experiment itself, rather than holding allocations fixed until the end. Drawing on multi-armed bandit algorithms such as Thompson Sampling or Upper Confidence Bound (UCB), it balances the exploration of uncertain variants with the exploitation of those already showing superior performance, typically yielding higher aggregate outcomes while still producing valid inferential conclusions.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Adaptive A/B Testing
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / experimental-design
  • Russo, D., Van Roy, B., Kazerouni, A., Osband, I., & Wen, Z. (2018). A Tutorial on Thompson Sampling. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 11(1), 1–96. · DOI 10.1561/2200000070
  • Offer-Westort, M., Coppock, A., & Green, D. P. (2021). Adaptive Experimental Design: Prospects and Applications in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 826–844. · DOI 10.1111/ajps.12597
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketAB Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketAdaptive Experimentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketBlocked A/B Testmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketFactorial A/B Testmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketMulti-arm experimentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainRandomized Controlled Trialmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account