Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Econometrics›Im-Pesaran-Shin (IPS) Panel Unit-Root Test
Hypothesis testPanel unit-root tests

Im-Pesaran-Shin (IPS) Panel Unit-Root Test

Also known as: IPS Test, IPS Panel Unit-Root Test, Heterogeneous Panel Unit-Root Test, Im-Pesaran-Shin Birim Kök Testi

The Im-Pesaran-Shin (IPS) test, introduced by Im, Pesaran, and Shin in 2003, is a panel unit-root test designed for heterogeneous panels where the autoregressive coefficient is allowed to differ across cross-sectional units. It averages individual Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) t-statistics and constructs a standardized statistic with a standard normal limiting distribution, making it one of the most widely applied first-generation panel unit-root tests in applied econometrics.

ScholarGate
  1. Hypothesis test
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Im-Pesaran-Shin Test
Breitung TestCIPS TestLevin-Lin-Chu TestFisher Panel Unit-Root T…

When to use it

Use the IPS test when working with macro or micro panels where heterogeneity across units is expected—for instance, different countries, firms, or regions may exhibit different speeds of adjustment. The test requires a balanced or nearly balanced panel with moderate T (at least 10–25 observations per unit). It assumes cross-sectional independence; if cross-sectional dependence is present, second-generation tests such as the CIPS test (Pesaran, 2007) should be preferred. The test is appropriate as a first step before applying panel cointegration or panel regression methods.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Allows heterogeneous autoregressive coefficients across cross-sectional units, relaxing the restrictive homogeneity assumption of the Levin-Lin-Chu test
  • The W-statistic has a well-established standard normal limiting distribution, enabling straightforward inference
  • More powerful than univariate ADF tests by exploiting the cross-sectional dimension of the panel
  • Accommodates different lag lengths across units via individual ADF specifications
Limitations
  • Assumes cross-sectional independence; spurious rejections can occur under cross-sectional dependence
  • The alternative hypothesis is composite—stationary for some units but not necessarily all—so rejection does not indicate which units are I(0)
  • Requires sufficiently large T for individual ADF regressions to be well-specified; performs poorly in very short panels
  • The tabulated mean and variance corrections are derived under specific distributional assumptions that may not hold in finite samples

Frequently asked

How does the IPS test differ from the Levin-Lin-Chu (LLC) test?

The LLC test imposes a common autoregressive coefficient rho across all panel units under both the null and the alternative, making it a homogeneous test. The IPS test relaxes this assumption, allowing rho_i to differ across units. As a result, the IPS alternative is composite—only some units need to be stationary—whereas the LLC alternative requires all units to be stationary simultaneously.

What should I do if my panel exhibits cross-sectional dependence?

The IPS test is a first-generation test that assumes cross-sectional independence. When dependence is present—common in macro panels subject to global shocks—size distortions can be severe. In this case, use second-generation tests such as the CIPS test of Pesaran (2007), which augments individual ADF regressions with cross-sectional averages to filter out common factors.

How do I select the lag length for the individual ADF regressions?

Lag lengths p_i may be chosen separately for each unit using information criteria such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or Schwarz Bayesian Criterion (BIC), or by sequential testing of residual autocorrelation. The IPS framework explicitly accommodates unit-specific lag lengths, so there is no requirement to impose a common p across all cross-sections.

Sources

  1. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Im-Pesaran-Shin (IPS) Panel Unit-Root Test. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/econometrics/im-pesaran-shin-test

Related methods

Breitung TestCIPS TestLevin-Lin-Chu Test

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Breitung TestEconometrics↔ compare
  • CIPS TestEconometrics↔ compare
  • Levin-Lin-Chu TestEconometrics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Breitung TestCIPS TestFisher Panel Unit-Root TestLevin-Lin-Chu Test

Similar methods

Panel ADF Unit Root TestCIPS TestLevin-Lin-Chu TestCADF TestPanel PP unit root testFisher Panel Unit-Root TestPanel KPSS testBreitung Test

Related reference concepts

EconometricsMultiple or Simultaneous Equation Models • Multiple VariablesMathematical and Quantitative MethodsFinancial EconometricsHeterogeneity in Meta-AnalysisSingle Equation Models • Single Variables

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Im-Pesaran-Shin Test (Im-Pesaran-Shin (IPS) Panel Unit-Root Test). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/econometrics/im-pesaran-shin-test · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Im, Pesaran & Shin
Year
2003
Type
Panel unit-root test allowing cross-sectional heterogeneity
Subfamily
Panel unit-root tests
Null Hypothesis
All cross-sectional units contain a unit root
Alternative Hypothesis
Some (but not necessarily all) cross-sectional units are stationary
Related methods
Breitung TestCIPS TestLevin-Lin-Chu Test
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account