Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Econometrics›Breitung Panel Unit-Root Test
Hypothesis testPanel unit-root tests

Breitung Panel Unit-Root Test

Also known as: Breitung Panel Unit-Root Test, Breitung (2000) Test, Breitung Nonparametric Panel Unit-Root Test, Breitung Panel Birim Kök Testi

The Breitung test, introduced by Jörg Breitung in 2000, is a nonparametric panel unit-root test designed to assess whether all cross-sectional units in a balanced panel share a common unit root. Unlike competing first-generation tests, it avoids bias-correction terms that depend on lag selection or kernel bandwidth estimation, thereby preserving local power under a homogeneous alternative. It is widely used in macroeconometrics and finance when the researcher suspects cross-sectional homogeneity in the autoregressive structure.

ScholarGate
  1. Hypothesis test
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Breitung Test
Fisher Panel Unit-Root T…Im-Pesaran-Shin TestLevin-Lin-Chu Test

When to use it

Apply the Breitung test when working with balanced macro or financial panels where a homogeneous autoregressive parameter across units is a credible assumption, such as GDP growth rates or interest rates across countries under a common monetary regime. The test requires a balanced panel with moderately large T (typically T > 10) and assumes cross-sectional independence among units. It is not appropriate when heterogeneous dynamics are expected (prefer Im-Pesaran-Shin in that case) or when cross-sectional dependence is present (prefer second-generation tests such as CIPS). Always complement it with at least one other panel unit-root test before drawing policy conclusions.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • No lag-length or kernel bandwidth selection needed, eliminating a common source of specification error.
  • Asymptotically standard normal distribution simplifies inference without special critical-value tables.
  • Higher local power than bias-corrected tests such as Levin-Lin-Chu under a homogeneous alternative.
  • Computationally simple to implement given its reliance on straightforward OLS on transformed series.
Limitations
  • Assumes a common (homogeneous) autoregressive parameter, making it inappropriate for heterogeneous panels.
  • Requires a balanced panel; missing observations in any cross-sectional unit invalidate the pooled regression.
  • Cross-sectional independence is a maintained assumption; violations lead to size distortions.
  • Consistent only under the joint limit N, T → ∞; inference may be unreliable in very short panels.

Frequently asked

How does the Breitung test differ from the Levin-Lin-Chu test?

Both impose a homogeneous autoregressive parameter and use pooled OLS, but Levin-Lin-Chu applies bias-correction terms that depend on lag augmentation and kernel estimates of long-run variance. Breitung's transformation removes nuisance parameters without these corrections, avoiding the associated variance inflation and achieving higher local power, at the cost of requiring strict cross-sectional independence.

Can the Breitung test be used with unbalanced panels?

The standard implementation requires a balanced panel because the partial-sum transformation accumulates observations across a fixed time index for each unit. Applying it naively to unbalanced data invalidates the asymptotic normality result. Researchers facing missing observations typically balance the panel by trimming or imputation before proceeding, though this introduces its own risks.

What should I do if cross-sectional dependence is suspected?

The Breitung test is a first-generation test and will exhibit severe size distortions under cross-sectional dependence. In that situation, second-generation tests—such as the Pesaran (2007) CIPS test or the Moon-Perron test—should be used instead, as they are designed to account for common factors driving cross-sectional correlation.

Sources

  1. Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 161–177. DOI: 10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Breitung Panel Unit-Root Test. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/econometrics/breitung-test

Related methods

Fisher Panel Unit-Root TestIm-Pesaran-Shin TestLevin-Lin-Chu Test

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Fisher Panel Unit-Root TestEconometrics↔ compare
  • Im-Pesaran-Shin TestEconometrics↔ compare
  • Levin-Lin-Chu TestEconometrics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Im-Pesaran-Shin TestLevin-Lin-Chu Test

Similar methods

Levin-Lin-Chu TestPanel ADF Unit Root TestPanel PP unit root testIm-Pesaran-Shin TestCIPS TestPanel Cointegration TestsCADF TestFisher Panel Unit-Root Test

Related reference concepts

EconometricsMathematical and Quantitative MethodsMultiple or Simultaneous Equation Models • Multiple VariablesEconometric ModelingPermutation TestsFinancial Econometrics

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Breitung Test (Breitung Panel Unit-Root Test). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/econometrics/breitung-test · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Jörg Breitung
Year
2000
Type
Nonparametric panel unit-root test
Subfamily
Panel unit-root tests
Null Hypothesis
All panel units contain a unit root (common autoregressive parameter equals one)
Correction
No lag-length or kernel bandwidth selection required
Related methods
Fisher Panel Unit-Root TestIm-Pesaran-Shin TestLevin-Lin-Chu Test
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account